Mathihalli . Madan Mohan,Senior Journalist and Columnist

No,1 Journalists Colony, HUBLI 580032

Tel No 2374872 ; Mobile : 94480 74872

Email: mathihallim@yahoo.co.in./  madan.mm@gmail.com

           

Panchayat Raj System – Karnataka Experience

            It is more than a quarter century ever since Karnataka pioneered democratic decentralisation experiment in Karnataka, providing a paradigm shift in the approach to the rural development from the centralized governance to the participatory one.

            Much water has flown under the bridge since then. Taking cue from Karnataka, the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi took initiative to get the 73^rd and 74^th Constitutional amendments passed to provide place and protection for the panchayat raj institutions in the Constitution with a view to freeing these institutions from the whims and fancies of the state governments. Karnataka was the quick to fashion a new panchayat law in the context of the Constitutional amendment in 1993, went in for a comprehensive amendment a decade later on in 2003 designed to provide more powers and financial sinews to enable the panchayat raj institutions to discharge their new responsibilities.

            Right from 1987, (barring two years of inaction), the three tier panchayat raj system is being managed by the representatives elected in five elections held so far and as of today, over  95,000 elected representatives  (with around 91,000 belonging to  gram panchayats alone)  are in charge of the zilla, taluk and gram panchayats in the thirty districts of Karnataka . They have the task of handling Rs.   11,000 crores plan and nonplan budget (of which non plan accounts for a lion share to mainly to meet the salary component of the state government employees seconded for services in the PRIs). In the process, the gram panchayat, at the lowest tier, which is the cutting edge of the new experiment, gets on an average anywhere between Rs.  80 to 100 lakhs of plan funds per years, which by any standards a princely sum compared to the pittance they received in the earlier dispensation. Besides, Karnataka has introduced a panchayat window in its budget from the year 2005-2006 giving details of the funds assigned to three tier system in the areas assigned to them under the Constitution.

            Though  twentyfive years are a too small a period  for making  any meaningful evaluation of the path breaking experiment designed to bring a new administrative ethos, the prognosis is far from satisfactory.   As George Mathew, the renowned social scientist has put it; the panchayat raj system in Karnataka has slid from a pristine position to an apology for democratic decentralisation.

            For, the centralisation reigns supreme even as the panchayat system continues to totter in an atmosphere marked with distrust, jealousy and what not. The concept of the primacy of the zilla parishat in the development matters  has been given a gobye  and  centralized control of the deputy commission over the affairs in the district as before  has been brought back.  The system has not been able to develop its own roots and endear itself to the rural community for the service of which it has been established.  In a way it appears to be the Cindrella of Karnataka, a beautiful princess not wanted by anybody.

              The question is what has gone wrong with the experiment with all the inputs it has received so far?        The problem in retrospect appears to be more of attitudinal change than law.  There is a marked reluctance on the part of the concerned in the system to come to terms with the ethos of the transfer of power that the experiment presages.

            The panchayat system has been squarely caught in swirl of problems at three levels- namely the political, administrative and internal contradiction.

            At the political level, the fact of the matter is hat the political leadership, which has put the system in place initially, has become wary of it.  As many as eight governments including the present one administered singly or severally by the three major political parties have ruled Karnataka ever since decentralisation experiment made its debut way back in 1987 by the Ramakrishna Hegde government. .  None of them at any time have evinced a genuine interest in carrying the experiment further. . As succinctly put by Mani Shankar Iyer, the Congress ideologue on decentralisation and former Union Minister for Panchayat raj, “every time the government change, the panchayat raj in Karnataka comes under threat.  Karnataka’s approach according to him has been “two steps forward and one step backward” phenomenon.

            The slide back had started initially during the regime of Hegde itself especially after the untimely demise of Abdul Nazir Sab, the coauthor of the move, which got accentuated in the subsequent days.

            For example, the provision relating to creation of  panchayat raj development parishat, which is something analogous to the national development council  which would serve as  a clearing house for policies on the panchayat raj, remains on paper.

 Apart from anything, this has deprived the PRIs of the only link with the government as a result of which they feel that they have become orphans. The move to have a District Planning Committees for planning integrated development of the rural and urban areas in the district has never been given a trial.  The evolution of a new planning process starting from villages to state level remains on paper.  Besides the governments of the day at no stage have shown interest in implementing the recommendations of the state finance commission, which are constituted to work out the devolution of funds between the state and the urban and rural local self governments.  As a matter of fact the recommendations of the Third State Finance Commission have been waiting to be implemented for the past three years.

            On the other hand, in the name of social engineering, the government has reduced the tenure of the adhyakshas for sixty months (five years) to twenty months. This has cut at the very root of the experiment, which was to throw up the alternate new leadership in the rural areas, since none of the incumbents get time to settle themselves to run the show.   And rotation system of reservation of seats at every election has proved to be disincentive for the members to perform well. For he or she is not sure whether the constituency can be retained the next time because of the rotation of reservation.          . The requests made for the restoration of the five year term and put two tenure limit for the reservation of seats, have fallen on deaf ears. Once the government even moved to withdraw the powers given to the gram panchayats through an amendment. But was rebuffed by the Governor who returned the bill on the grounds that it was violative of the Constitution.

            The disinterest of the political leadership in the experiment had its impact on the attitude of the legislators, who have perceived the system, as something of a threat to the hegemony they have been enjoying all these days. It is no longer a secret that the first law of the panchayat raj was passed during the Hegde regime, even as the legislators cutting across the party barriers had their own reservations in decentralisation and transfer of powers to the panchayat raj institutions (PRIs). Hegde had to make compromise in the form providing exofficio membership of the panchayat bodies to get the bill passed.

            Their main worry all along has been that the PRI members would emerge as alternate centres of power in the districts and taluks to threaten their own position. For example, a Minister apprehends that a successful zilla panchayat president could be his potential rival and like wise the MLAs feel that a successful taluk panchayat president could be so in the taluks.  The present day MLAs thoroughly relish the power to sanction schools, roads and buildings, allotment of houses and house sites and drinking water schemes, and the power to get teachers transferred. If these are taken away and given to PRIs, they would become irrelevant. Therefore they have been losing no opportunity to deride and denigrate panchayat institutions. Hardly any meaningful discussions take place in the assembly. It is the same plight in the Legislative Council, where onethird of the members represent the local bodies, where the bulk of the voters comprise of PRI members.

            At the administrative level, the problem is a bit different. Their interest or otherwise in the system has a direct bearing on the thinking of the political masters. When the political masters wanted it way back in the middle of eighties, the IAS brigade burnt midnight oil to prepare blue print for the successful implementation of the experiment. But when the political masters showed signs of disinterest, the bureaucracy could not be expected to the different. But even in this atmosphere too, some of the good things which have taken place, have happened because of the few good intentioned officers. For example, the government was dragging its feet on implementation of the law passed in 2003 giving more powers to the PRIs. It was at the higher level of bureaucracy that a few well intentioned officials led by the then Additional Chief Secretary and Development Commissioner Mr. Chiranjivi Singh who put together the act together in the middle of 2004, prodded by the question raised by the Assurance Committee chairman Mr. D R Patil Congress MLA..  The accountability and transparency that the system envisages has been something of an anathema to the middle level bureaucracy.

            The PRI members have contributed in their own way to the conundrum through internal bickerings. The members of the three tiers are more worried about the powers they have and do not have between themselves rather than put their heads together to make a success of the responsibilities given tot hem under the law to provide an administration responsive to the peoples needs and solves problem with their collaboration. Several of the NGOs including the Gram Panchayat Hakkottaya Sammelana, have been trying to mobile the support for the revitalization of the system and  a state level convention was held at Udipi  in the second week of December to discuss several issues. But all these would be of no use in the absence of a professed commitment at the political level. At the moment there are no signs of the same happening in Karnataka.

            (eom)  16^th Dec. 2011 .

           

.

  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Mathihalli . Madan Mohan,Senior Journalist and Columnist

No,1 Journalists Colony, HUBLI 580032

Tel No 2374872 ; Mobile : 94480 74872

Email: mathihallim@yahoo.co.in./  madan.mm@gmail.com

           

Panchayat Raj System – Karnataka Experience

            It is more than a quarter century ever since Karnataka pioneered democratic decentralisation experiment in Karnataka, providing a paradigm shift in the approach to the rural development from the centralized governance to the participatory one.

            Much water has flown under the bridge since then. Taking cue from Karnataka, the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi took initiative to get the 73^rd and 74^th Constitutional amendments passed to provide place and protection for the panchayat raj institutions in the Constitution with a view to freeing these institutions from the whims and fancies of the state governments. Karnataka was the quick to fashion a new panchayat law in the context of the Constitutional amendment in 1993, went in for a comprehensive amendment a decade later on in 2003 designed to provide more powers and financial sinews to enable the panchayat raj institutions to discharge their new responsibilities.

            Right from 1987, (barring two years of inaction), the three tier panchayat raj system is being managed by the representatives elected in five elections held so far and as of today, over  95,000 elected representatives  (with around 91,000 belonging to  gram panchayats alone)  are in charge of the zilla, taluk and gram panchayats in the thirty districts of Karnataka . They have the task of handling Rs.   11,000 crores plan and nonplan budget (of which non plan accounts for a lion share to mainly to meet the salary component of the state government employees seconded for services in the PRIs). In the process, the gram panchayat, at the lowest tier, which is the cutting edge of the new experiment, gets on an average anywhere between Rs.  80 to 100 lakhs of plan funds per years, which by any standards a princely sum compared to the pittance they received in the earlier dispensation. Besides, Karnataka has introduced a panchayat window in its budget from the year 2005-2006 giving details of the funds assigned to three tier system in the areas assigned to them under the Constitution.

            Though  twentyfive years are a too small a period  for making  any meaningful evaluation of the path breaking experiment designed to bring a new administrative ethos, the prognosis is far from satisfactory.   As George Mathew, the renowned social scientist has put it; the panchayat raj system in Karnataka has slid from a pristine position to an apology for democratic decentralisation.

            For, the centralisation reigns supreme even as the panchayat system continues to totter in an atmosphere marked with distrust, jealousy and what not. The concept of the primacy of the zilla parishat in the development matters  has been given a gobye  and  centralized control of the deputy commission over the affairs in the district as before  has been brought back.  The system has not been able to develop its own roots and endear itself to the rural community for the service of which it has been established.  In a way it appears to be the Cindrella of Karnataka, a beautiful princess not wanted by anybody.

              The question is what has gone wrong with the experiment with all the inputs it has received so far?        The problem in retrospect appears to be more of attitudinal change than law.  There is a marked reluctance on the part of the concerned in the system to come to terms with the ethos of the transfer of power that the experiment presages.

            The panchayat system has been squarely caught in swirl of problems at three levels- namely the political, administrative and internal contradiction.

            At the political level, the fact of the matter is hat the political leadership, which has put the system in place initially, has become wary of it.  As many as eight governments including the present one administered singly or severally by the three major political parties have ruled Karnataka ever since decentralisation experiment made its debut way back in 1987 by the Ramakrishna Hegde government. .  None of them at any time have evinced a genuine interest in carrying the experiment further. . As succinctly put by Mani Shankar Iyer, the Congress ideologue on decentralisation and former Union Minister for Panchayat raj, “every time the government change, the panchayat raj in Karnataka comes under threat.  Karnataka’s approach according to him has been “two steps forward and one step backward” phenomenon.

            The slide back had started initially during the regime of Hegde itself especially after the untimely demise of Abdul Nazir Sab, the coauthor of the move, which got accentuated in the subsequent days.

            For example, the provision relating to creation of  panchayat raj development parishat, which is something analogous to the national development council  which would serve as  a clearing house for policies on the panchayat raj, remains on paper.

 Apart from anything, this has deprived the PRIs of the only link with the government as a result of which they feel that they have become orphans. The move to have a District Planning Committees for planning integrated development of the rural and urban areas in the district has never been given a trial.  The evolution of a new planning process starting from villages to state level remains on paper.  Besides the governments of the day at no stage have shown interest in implementing the recommendations of the state finance commission, which are constituted to work out the devolution of funds between the state and the urban and rural local self governments.  As a matter of fact the recommendations of the Third State Finance Commission have been waiting to be implemented for the past three years.

            On the other hand, in the name of social engineering, the government has reduced the tenure of the adhyakshas for sixty months (five years) to twenty months. This has cut at the very root of the experiment, which was to throw up the alternate new leadership in the rural areas, since none of the incumbents get time to settle themselves to run the show.   And rotation system of reservation of seats at every election has proved to be disincentive for the members to perform well. For he or she is not sure whether the constituency can be retained the next time because of the rotation of reservation.          . The requests made for the restoration of the five year term and put two tenure limit for the reservation of seats, have fallen on deaf ears. Once the government even moved to withdraw the powers given to the gram panchayats through an amendment. But was rebuffed by the Governor who returned the bill on the grounds that it was violative of the Constitution.

            The disinterest of the political leadership in the experiment had its impact on the attitude of the legislators, who have perceived the system, as something of a threat to the hegemony they have been enjoying all these days. It is no longer a secret that the first law of the panchayat raj was passed during the Hegde regime, even as the legislators cutting across the party barriers had their own reservations in decentralisation and transfer of powers to the panchayat raj institutions (PRIs). Hegde had to make compromise in the form providing exofficio membership of the panchayat bodies to get the bill passed.

            Their main worry all along has been that the PRI members would emerge as alternate centres of power in the districts and taluks to threaten their own position. For example, a Minister apprehends that a successful zilla panchayat president could be his potential rival and like wise the MLAs feel that a successful taluk panchayat president could be so in the taluks.  The present day MLAs thoroughly relish the power to sanction schools, roads and buildings, allotment of houses and house sites and drinking water schemes, and the power to get teachers transferred. If these are taken away and given to PRIs, they would become irrelevant. Therefore they have been losing no opportunity to deride and denigrate panchayat institutions. Hardly any meaningful discussions take place in the assembly. It is the same plight in the Legislative Council, where onethird of the members represent the local bodies, where the bulk of the voters comprise of PRI members.

            At the administrative level, the problem is a bit different. Their interest or otherwise in the system has a direct bearing on the thinking of the political masters. When the political masters wanted it way back in the middle of eighties, the IAS brigade burnt midnight oil to prepare blue print for the successful implementation of the experiment. But when the political masters showed signs of disinterest, the bureaucracy could not be expected to the different. But even in this atmosphere too, some of the good things which have taken place, have happened because of the few good intentioned officers. For example, the government was dragging its feet on implementation of the law passed in 2003 giving more powers to the PRIs. It was at the higher level of bureaucracy that a few well intentioned officials led by the then Additional Chief Secretary and Development Commissioner Mr. Chiranjivi Singh who put together the act together in the middle of 2004, prodded by the question raised by the Assurance Committee chairman Mr. D R Patil Congress MLA..  The accountability and transparency that the system envisages has been something of an anathema to the middle level bureaucracy.

            The PRI members have contributed in their own way to the conundrum through internal bickerings. The members of the three tiers are more worried about the powers they have and do not have between themselves rather than put their heads together to make a success of the responsibilities given tot hem under the law to provide an administration responsive to the peoples needs and solves problem with their collaboration. Several of the NGOs including the Gram Panchayat Hakkottaya Sammelana, have been trying to mobile the support for the revitalization of the system and  a state level convention was held at Udipi  in the second week of December to discuss several issues. But all these would be of no use in the absence of a professed commitment at the political level. At the moment there are no signs of the same happening in Karnataka.

            (eom)  16^th Dec. 2011 .

           

.

  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Mathihalli . Madan Mohan,Senior Journalist and Columnist

No,1 Journalists Colony, HUBLI 580032

Tel No 2374872 ; Mobile : 94480 74872

Email: mathihallim@yahoo.co.in./  madan.mm@gmail.com

           

Panchayat Raj System – Karnataka Experience

            It is more than a quarter century ever since Karnataka pioneered democratic decentralisation experiment in Karnataka, providing a paradigm shift in the approach to the rural development from the centralized governance to the participatory one.

            Much water has flown under the bridge since then. Taking cue from Karnataka, the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi took initiative to get the 73^rd and 74^th Constitutional amendments passed to provide place and protection for the panchayat raj institutions in the Constitution with a view to freeing these institutions from the whims and fancies of the state governments. Karnataka was the quick to fashion a new panchayat law in the context of the Constitutional amendment in 1993, went in for a comprehensive amendment a decade later on in 2003 designed to provide more powers and financial sinews to enable the panchayat raj institutions to discharge their new responsibilities.

            Right from 1987, (barring two years of inaction), the three tier panchayat raj system is being managed by the representatives elected in five elections held so far and as of today, over  95,000 elected representatives  (with around 91,000 belonging to  gram panchayats alone)  are in charge of the zilla, taluk and gram panchayats in the thirty districts of Karnataka . They have the task of handling Rs.   11,000 crores plan and nonplan budget (of which non plan accounts for a lion share to mainly to meet the salary component of the state government employees seconded for services in the PRIs). In the process, the gram panchayat, at the lowest tier, which is the cutting edge of the new experiment, gets on an average anywhere between Rs.  80 to 100 lakhs of plan funds per years, which by any standards a princely sum compared to the pittance they received in the earlier dispensation. Besides, Karnataka has introduced a panchayat window in its budget from the year 2005-2006 giving details of the funds assigned to three tier system in the areas assigned to them under the Constitution.

            Though  twentyfive years are a too small a period  for making  any meaningful evaluation of the path breaking experiment designed to bring a new administrative ethos, the prognosis is far from satisfactory.   As George Mathew, the renowned social scientist has put it; the panchayat raj system in Karnataka has slid from a pristine position to an apology for democratic decentralisation.

            For, the centralisation reigns supreme even as the panchayat system continues to totter in an atmosphere marked with distrust, jealousy and what not. The concept of the primacy of the zilla parishat in the development matters  has been given a gobye  and  centralized control of the deputy commission over the affairs in the district as before  has been brought back.  The system has not been able to develop its own roots and endear itself to the rural community for the service of which it has been established.  In a way it appears to be the Cindrella of Karnataka, a beautiful princess not wanted by anybody.

              The question is what has gone wrong with the experiment with all the inputs it has received so far?        The problem in retrospect appears to be more of attitudinal change than law.  There is a marked reluctance on the part of the concerned in the system to come to terms with the ethos of the transfer of power that the experiment presages.

            The panchayat system has been squarely caught in swirl of problems at three levels- namely the political, administrative and internal contradiction.

            At the political level, the fact of the matter is hat the political leadership, which has put the system in place initially, has become wary of it.  As many as eight governments including the present one administered singly or severally by the three major political parties have ruled Karnataka ever since decentralisation experiment made its debut way back in 1987 by the Ramakrishna Hegde government. .  None of them at any time have evinced a genuine interest in carrying the experiment further. . As succinctly put by Mani Shankar Iyer, the Congress ideologue on decentralisation and former Union Minister for Panchayat raj, “every time the government change, the panchayat raj in Karnataka comes under threat.  Karnataka’s approach according to him has been “two steps forward and one step backward” phenomenon.

            The slide back had started initially during the regime of Hegde itself especially after the untimely demise of Abdul Nazir Sab, the coauthor of the move, which got accentuated in the subsequent days.

            For example, the provision relating to creation of  panchayat raj development parishat, which is something analogous to the national development council  which would serve as  a clearing house for policies on the panchayat raj, remains on paper.

 Apart from anything, this has deprived the PRIs of the only link with the government as a result of which they feel that they have become orphans. The move to have a District Planning Committees for planning integrated development of the rural and urban areas in the district has never been given a trial.  The evolution of a new planning process starting from villages to state level remains on paper.  Besides the governments of the day at no stage have shown interest in implementing the recommendations of the state finance commission, which are constituted to work out the devolution of funds between the state and the urban and rural local self governments.  As a matter of fact the recommendations of the Third State Finance Commission have been waiting to be implemented for the past three years.

            On the other hand, in the name of social engineering, the government has reduced the tenure of the adhyakshas for sixty months (five years) to twenty months. This has cut at the very root of the experiment, which was to throw up the alternate new leadership in the rural areas, since none of the incumbents get time to settle themselves to run the show.   And rotation system of reservation of seats at every election has proved to be disincentive for the members to perform well. For he or she is not sure whether the constituency can be retained the next time because of the rotation of reservation.          . The requests made for the restoration of the five year term and put two tenure limit for the reservation of seats, have fallen on deaf ears. Once the government even moved to withdraw the powers given to the gram panchayats through an amendment. But was rebuffed by the Governor who returned the bill on the grounds that it was violative of the Constitution.

            The disinterest of the political leadership in the experiment had its impact on the attitude of the legislators, who have perceived the system, as something of a threat to the hegemony they have been enjoying all these days. It is no longer a secret that the first law of the panchayat raj was passed during the Hegde regime, even as the legislators cutting across the party barriers had their own reservations in decentralisation and transfer of powers to the panchayat raj institutions (PRIs). Hegde had to make compromise in the form providing exofficio membership of the panchayat bodies to get the bill passed.

            Their main worry all along has been that the PRI members would emerge as alternate centres of power in the districts and taluks to threaten their own position. For example, a Minister apprehends that a successful zilla panchayat president could be his potential rival and like wise the MLAs feel that a successful taluk panchayat president could be so in the taluks.  The present day MLAs thoroughly relish the power to sanction schools, roads and buildings, allotment of houses and house sites and drinking water schemes, and the power to get teachers transferred. If these are taken away and given to PRIs, they would become irrelevant. Therefore they have been losing no opportunity to deride and denigrate panchayat institutions. Hardly any meaningful discussions take place in the assembly. It is the same plight in the Legislative Council, where onethird of the members represent the local bodies, where the bulk of the voters comprise of PRI members.

            At the administrative level, the problem is a bit different. Their interest or otherwise in the system has a direct bearing on the thinking of the political masters. When the political masters wanted it way back in the middle of eighties, the IAS brigade burnt midnight oil to prepare blue print for the successful implementation of the experiment. But when the political masters showed signs of disinterest, the bureaucracy could not be expected to the different. But even in this atmosphere too, some of the good things which have taken place, have happened because of the few good intentioned officers. For example, the government was dragging its feet on implementation of the law passed in 2003 giving more powers to the PRIs. It was at the higher level of bureaucracy that a few well intentioned officials led by the then Additional Chief Secretary and Development Commissioner Mr. Chiranjivi Singh who put together the act together in the middle of 2004, prodded by the question raised by the Assurance Committee chairman Mr. D R Patil Congress MLA..  The accountability and transparency that the system envisages has been something of an anathema to the middle level bureaucracy.

            The PRI members have contributed in their own way to the conundrum through internal bickerings. The members of the three tiers are more worried about the powers they have and do not have between themselves rather than put their heads together to make a success of the responsibilities given tot hem under the law to provide an administration responsive to the peoples needs and solves problem with their collaboration. Several of the NGOs including the Gram Panchayat Hakkottaya Sammelana, have been trying to mobile the support for the revitalization of the system and  a state level convention was held at Udipi  in the second week of December to discuss several issues. But all these would be of no use in the absence of a professed commitment at the political level. At the moment there are no signs of the same happening in Karnataka.

            (eom)  16^th Dec. 2011 .

           

.

  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Implications of Sriramulus win in Bellary bye poll

£Á¬ÄAiÀÄÄ ¨Á®ªÀ£ÀÄß C¯Áèr¸À¨ÉÃPÉÆà CxÀªÁ ¨Á®ªÀ£ÀÄß £Á¬Ä C¯Áèr¸À¨ÉÃPÉÆà  J£ÀÄߪÀzÉà  §¼Áîj UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ «zsÁ£ ¸À¨sÁ  G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è JzÀÝ ªÀÄÄRå ¥Àæ±Éß.

       PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è£À F gÁdQÃAiÀÄ zÀéAzÀé PÉÌ C°è£À ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ EzÉ gÀ«ªÁgÀ GvÀÛgÀ PÉÆnÖzÁÝgÉ - ¨Á®ªÀÅ £Á¬ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C¯Áèr¹vÀÛzÉ JAzÀÄ. ¸ÀévÀAvÀæªÁV ¸Àà¢üð¹zÀ gÉrØ UÀÄA¦£À ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ ªÀiÁf ªÀÄAwæ ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæZÀAqÀ §ºÀĪÀÄvÀ¢AzÀ G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¥À£ÀgÁAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀzÀ®èzÉà ¨sÁd¥À C¨sÀåyð vÀ£Àß oÉêÀtÂAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉƼÀÄîªÀAvÉ, PÁAUÉæ¸À C¨sÀåyðAiÀÄ vÀ¼ºÀ¢ E£ÀÆß PÀĹAiÀÄĪÀAvÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

       DzÀgÉ F ºÉƸÀ ¹zÁÝAvÀªÀÅ UÀtÂzsÀtÂUÀ¼ÉAzÉà ¥Àæ¹zÀÞªÁzÀ §¼Áîj f¯ÉèUÉ ¹Ã«ÄvÀªÁVzÉAiÉÆà CxÀªÁ gÁdåªÁ¦ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀiÁV ºÀgÀqÀ§ºÀÄzÉÆà J£ÀÄߪÀzÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA¢£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è PÁzÀÄ £ÉÆÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÁVzÉ.  vÀªÀÄä ¥Àæ¨sÁªÀ MAzÀÄ f¯ÉèUÉ ¹Ã«ÄvÀªÁUÀ¨ÉÃPÁV®è. ¨ÉÃgÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ f¯ÉèUÀ½UÀÆ ºÀ§â§ºÀÄzÀÄ  J£ÀÄߪÀzÀ£ÀÄß gÉrØ UÀÄA¦£ÀªÀgÀÄ FUÁUÀ¯Éà vÉÆÃj¹zÁÝgÉ.

        ²æà gÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß UÀzÀUÀ f¯ÉèAiÀÄ G¸ÀÄÛªÁj ªÀÄAwæAiÀÄ£ÁßV ªÀiÁrzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, D f¯ÉAiÀÄ°èAiÀÄÆ vÀªÀÄä ¥Àæ¨sÁªÀ ¤Ãj, C°èAiÀÄ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ £ÀPÉëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß §zÀ°¹, PÁAUÉæ¹UÉ DWÁvÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ. EzÀgÀAvÉ PÀ¼ÉzÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è, gÁAiÀÄZÀÆgÀÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ PÉëÃvÀæzÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ G¸ÀÄÛªÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀjUÉ ªÀ»¹zÁUÀ. D f¯ÉèUÉ ¸ÉÃgÀzÀ M§â C£ÁªÀÄzsÉÃAiÀÄ£À£ÀÄß  Dj¹ vÀA¢zÁÝgÉ. £ÉÆgɺÉÆgÉAiÀÄ zÁªÀtUÉÃj f¯ÉèAiÀÄ ºÀgÀ¥À£ÀºÀ½î «zsÁ£À¸À¨sÁ PÉëÃvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß PÉʪÀ±À ªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀgÀÄ. ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ PÀªÀÄ® PÁAiÀiÁðZÀgÀuÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÁðºÀPÀgÁV  «gÉÆâü ¥ÀPÀëzÀ ±Á¸ÀPÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨sÁd¥ÀPÉÌ ¸É¼ÉAiÀÄĪÀ PÉ®¸ÀzÀ°è CªÀgÀÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ f¯ÉèUÀ½UÉ ZÀÄAZÀÄ ¥ÀæªÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ. DzÀgÉ EzÉà UÀtÂzsÀtÂUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀ¼ÉzÀ ¯ÉÆPÀ¸À¨sÁ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è §¼Áîj ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ PÉëÃvÀæ¢AzÀ vÀ£Àß C¨sÀåyð DAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀzÀPÉÌ ºÀgÀ ¸ÁºÀ¸À ªÀiÁr Cw ¸ÀtÚ §ºÀĪÀÄvÀ¢AzÀ dAiÀÄzÀ UÀÄjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀ®Ä¦zÀÄÝ PÀÆqÀ ªÀÄgÉAiÀÄĪÀAw®è.

        EªÉ®èªÀ£ÀÆß CªÀgÀÄ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝAlÄ. CzÀ£ÀÆß  FUÀ vÀªÀÄä ªÉÊAiÀÄÄQÛPÀ £É¯ÉAiÀÄ°è FUÀ ªÀiÁr¹PÉƼÀè¨ÉÃPÀµÉÖÃ. CzÀPÀÆÌ CªÀgÀ ¤Ã°£ÀPÉë vÀAiÀiÁgÁVzÉ.  CªÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄäzÉà DzÀ ºÉƸÀ ¥ÀPÀëªÀ£ÀÄß PÀlÖ°zÁÝgÉ. vÀªÀÄä PÀqÉUÉ £À®ªÀvÀÄÛ ±Á¸ÀPÀjzÁÝgÉ JAzÀÄ  ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä DUÀ¯Éà ºÉýzÁÝgÉ. EªÀg£ÀÄß N¯ÉʸÀ®Ä EªÀgÀ eÉÆv ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ªÉÄÊwæ ªÀiÁrPÉƼÀî®Ä eÁ zÀ¼ÀzÀ PÀĪÀiÁgÀ¸Áé«Ä vÀÄ¢UÁ® ªÉÄÃ¯É ¤AwzÁÝgÉ. PÀ¼ÉzÀ ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è §ºÀ¼À wtÂPÁrzÀgÀÆ, GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è £É¯É PÀAqÀÄPÉƼÀî®Ä «¥sÀ®ªÁzÀ eÁ.zÀ¼À FUÀ gÉrØ UÀÄA¦£À PÀÄzÀÄgÉ Kj vÀªÀÄä gÁdQÃAiÀÄ ¸ÁªÀiÁædåªÀ£ÀÄß PÀlÄÖªÀ ºÀÄ£ÁßgÀzÀ°è EzÁÝgÉ.  EzÀ£ÀÄß zÀȶÖAiÀÄ°è ElÄÖPÉÆAqÉÃ, PÀĪÀiÁgÀ¸Áé«ÄAiÀĪÀgÀÄ §¼ÁèjAiÀÄ G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è vÀªÀÄä C¨sÀåyðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀtQ̽¸À°®è. ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®ÄgÀªÀgÀ ¸ÁªÀÄxÀåðzÀ Cj«zÀÝgÀÆ, ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀgÀÄ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ ¨ÉA§®«®èzÉà  d¬Ä¸ÀĪÀgÉÆà J£ÀÄߪÀ ¸ÀA±ÀAiÀĪÀÇ CªÀgÀ°è EzÀÄÝzÀjAzÀ,  PÀĪÀiÁgÀ¸Áé«ÄAiÀĪÀgÀÄ  ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀjUÉ ¨ÉA§® ¸ÀÆa¸ÀĪÀ  EAVvÀ vÉÆÃj¹zÀgÉà ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ §»gÀAUÀªÁV ºÉüÀ°®è. vÉÆÃj¹zÀÄÝ.  ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä «dAiÀıÁ°UÀ¼ÁzÀgÉAzÀÄ WÉÆõÀuÉ ªÀiÁrzÀ vÀPÀëtªÉÃ, vÁªÀÅ PÁAUÉæ¸À/¨sÁd¥À «gÉÆâü¸ÀĪÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨ÉA§°¸ÀÄvÉÛÃªÉ J£ÀÄߪÀ ºÉýPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆlÖzÀÄÝ.

       EzÉãÁzÀgÀÆ AiÀıÀ¹éAiÀiÁzÀgÉ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ £ÀPÉëAiÉÄà §z¯ÁUÀĪÀ J®è ¸ÁzsÀåvÉUÀ¼ÀÆ EªÉ. ªÉÆzÀ®Ä DUÀĪÀAvÀºÀzÀÄ ¨sÁd¥À ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ ¥ÀvÀ£À. £ÀAvÀgÀ £ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ ºÉƸÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è, ¨sÁd¥À/PÁAUÉæ¸À «gÉÆâü PÀÆlªÉÇAzÀÄ gÀAUÀPÉÌ E½AiÀÄĪÀ ¸ÀA¨sÀªÀ.  EzÀjAzÀ ¨sÁd¥À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁAUÉæ¸ÀUÀ¼À §® QëÃt.  ªÀÄvÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀjzÀÄ ºÀAaºÉÆÃUÀĪÀ ¥ÀjuÁªÀĪÁV, AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀPÀëPÀÆÌ §ºÀĪÀÄvÀ ¹UÀzÉà ¸À«Ää±Àé ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ AiÀÄÄUÀzÀ ¥ÀÄ£gÁªÀvÁgÀ. CªÀPÁ±ÀªÁ¢ gÁdPÁgÀtÂUÀ½UÉ PÉƼÉî ºÉÆqÉAiÀÄĪÀ ªÀÄÄPÀÛ CªÀPÁ±À.

       KPÉAzÀgÉ  EªÀj§âjVgÀĪÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ ¹zÁÝAvÀzÀ°è K£ÀÄ ªÀåvÁå¸À«®è.  ¸Áé©üªÀiÁ£ÀzÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀtQ̽zÀ ²æà gÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀjUÉ UÉÆwÛgÀĪÀzÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ¸Áé©üªÀiÁ£ÀªÉà ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ d£ÀgÀ CxÀªÁ gÁdåzÀ ¸Áé©üªÀiÁ£ÀªÀ®è. (CPÀæªÀÄ UÀtÂUÁjPÉAiÀÄ §UÉÎ ¯ÉÆÃPÀAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ PÉÆlÖ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è vªÀÄä ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ EgÀĪÀzÀÄ CªÀjUÉ £ÉÆêÀÅ vÀA¢®è. CzÀgÉ CzÀgÀ CzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÁÜ£À ªÀAavÀgÀ£ÁßV ªÀiÁrzÀ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ ªÀvÀð£É CªÀgÀ ¸Áé©üªÀiÁ£ÀPÉÌ zsÀPÉÌ vÀA¢zÉ.). PÀĪÀiÁgÀ¸Áé«ÄAiÀĪÀgÀzÀÄ KPÀ ªÀÄÄR gÁdQÃAiÀÄ. C¢üPÁgÀPÁÌV CªÀgÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ. CzÀgÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV AiÀiÁgÉÆA¢UÁzÀgÀÆ ¸ÀRå ¨É¼É¸À®Ä CªÀgÀÄ ¹zÀÞ. FUÁUÀ¯Éà ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀgÀÄ ¨sÁ« ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÉA§ PÀ£À¸À£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ »A¨Á®PÀgÀÄ PÁt®Ä ±ÀÄgÀĪÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.

       EzÉ®è MAzÀÄ ªÀÄÄRå ¨É¼ÀªÀtÂUÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É CªÀ®A©¹zÉ. CzÉAzÀgÉ  F CªÀPÁ±ÀªÁ¢ gÁdPÁgÀtÂUÀ¼À ªÉÄÊwÛ PÀÆl PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀ «±Áé¸ÀªÀ£ÀÄß UÀ½¸À®Ä ±ÀPÀåªÁ¢ÃvÉÃ? J£ÀÄߪÀ ¥Àæ±ÉßUÉ ªÀÄvÀzÁggÀÄ PÉÆqÀĪÀ GvÀÛgÀ.  gÉrØ UÀÄA¥ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄæ eÁzÀ¼ÀzÀªÀgÀÄ §zÀÝ ªÉÊjUÀ¼ÀÄ. PÀĪÀiÁgÀ¸Áé«ÄAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁVzÁÝUÀ gÉrØ UÀÄA¦£À d£ÁzÀð£À gÉrØAiÀĪÀgÉà UÀt ºÀUÀgÀtPÉÌ £ÁA¢AiÀiÁzÀ ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁA§£ÀÄß ¹r¹zÀÄÝ. §»gÀAUÀªÁV CA¢£À ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀt ªÀÄÆ®UÀ½AzÀ CPÀæªÀĪÁV ºÀtUÀ½¹zÀgÉAzÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¥À ªÀiÁrzÀªÀgÀÄ. EA¢£À ªÀgÉUÉ ªÉÊjUÀ¼ÁV ¥ÀgÀ¸ÀàgÀ ªÀÄÆzÀ°¹, vÀªÀÄä°ègÀĪÀ ªÉÊgÀvÀéªÀ£ÀÄß ©lÄÖ UɼÉAiÀÄgÁ§ºÀÄzÀÄ. DzÀgÉ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀjUÉ EzÉ®èªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄgÉAiÀįÁ¢ÃvÉÃ?  gÉrØUÀ¼À vÀªÀgÀÄ f¯ÉèAiÀiÁzÀ §¼Áèj f¯ÉèAiÀÄ°è JgÀqÀÄ UÀÄA¥ÀÄUÀ¼À PÁAiÀÄðPÀvÀðgÀÄ MAzÁUÀ¯ÁgÀgÀÄ.

        ZÀÄ£ÁªuÉUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀ ªÀvÀð£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß UÀªÀĤ¸ÀÄvÀÛ¯Éà §AzÀ PÉ®ªÀgÀÄ ºÉüÀĪÀzÀ£ÀÄß ¤®ðQë¸ÀĪÀAw®è.  ¨sÀæµÁÖZÁgÀzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀPÀëzÀ/ C¨sÀåyðUÀ¼À ºÀuɧgÀºÀ ¤zsÁðj¸ÀĪÀ¢®è. ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀgÀÄ £ÉÆqÀĪÀzÀÄ  £ÀA©PÉ  ¤µÉ× «±Áé¸ÁºÀðvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß.. EzÀjAzÀ¯Éèà 2008gÀ°è, PÀĪÀiÁgÀ¸Áé«ÄAiÀĪÀgÀ £ÀA©UÉ zÉÆæúÀªÀ£Éßà ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁrzÀ ¨sÁd¥ÀªÀÅ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀ ªÀÄ£ÀßuÉ ¥ÀqÉÀAiÀÄĪÀ°è  AiÀıÀ¹éAiÀiÁ¬ÄvÀÄ. gÉrØUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀgÀÄ f¯ÉèAiÀiÁzÀ §¼ÁîjAiÀÄ°è d£ÀgÀ £ÀA©PÉUÉ ¥ÁvÀægÁVgÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ. DzÀgÉ Erà gÁdåzÀ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ §¼ÁîjAiÀÄ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀAvÉ ¥ÀæwPÀæ¬Ä¸ÀÄvÁÛgÉ JAzÀÄ ¨sÁ«¸ÀĪÀzÀÄ vÀ¥Áà¢ÃvÀÄ. gÉrØUÀ¼ÉÆqÀ£É ¸ÀRå ¨É¼É¹zÀgÉAzÀÄ GvÀægÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ eÁ zÀ¼ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉUÀ® ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀÆr¹ PÉÆAqÀÄ ªÉÄgɸÀÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ JAzÀÄ ¨sÁ«¸ÀĪÀzÀÄ zÁµÀÖ÷ÛðzÀ ªÀiÁvÁ¢ÃvÀÄ.

        gÉrØ UÀÄA¥ÀÄ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ ²±ÀÄ. CA¢£À  ²±ÀĪÀÅ  EAzÀÄ §æºÀägÁPÀë¸À£ÀAvÉ ¨É¼ÉzÀÄ ¨É¼É¹zÀªÀgÀ£Éßà w£ÀÄߪÀ ºÉzÀjPÉ ºÁPÀĪÀAvÁVzÉ. gÉrØUÀ¼À ªÀÄÆ®PÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ gÁdPÁgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß PÀ®Ä¶vÀUÉƽ¹,  ºÀt§®¢AzÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß UÀ½¸ÀĪÀ ºÉƸÀ C¤µÀÖ ¥ÀgÀA¥ÀgÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÄlÄÖºÁQzÀ “zsÀªÀ¼”À QÃwðAiÀÄÆ ¨sÁd¥ÀPÉÌ CzÀgÀ°èAiÀÄÆ ªÀiÁf ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁzÀ AiÀÄqÉAiÀÄÆgÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀjUÉ ¸À®è¯Éà ¨ÉÃPÀÄ. vÁªÀÅ E°èAiÀÄ vÀ£ÀPÀ ªÀiÁrzÀ ¸ÀªÁj ºÀÄ°AiÀÄ ¨É¤ß£À ªÉÄÃ¯É  ªÀiÁrzÀ ¸ÀªÁj JAzÀÄ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ gÁdå ªÀÄlÖzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁ¶ÖçÃAiÀÄ £ÁAiÀÄPÀjUÉ EAzÀÄ C¤ß¸ÀgÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀPÁÌV «µÁzÀªÀ£ÀÆß ¥ÀqÀÄwÛgÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ.

       gÉrØUÀ¼ÀÄ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ°è EgÀĪÁUÀ¯ÉÃ, vÀªÀÄVgÀĪÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ ªÀĺÀvÁéPÁAPÉë  ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀÄ ¥ÀzÀzÀ ªÉÄðgÀĪÀ  PÀtÄÚ. EªÀÅ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀÄ gÀºÀ¸ÀåªÁV EnÖgÀ°®è. CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ滸ÀĪÀ AiÀiÁªÀ PÀæªÀÄPÉÊPÉƼÀî°®è. CzÀgÀ §zÀ¯ÁV CªÀgÀ ªÀiÁwUÉ AiÀÄqÉAiÀÄÆgÀ¥Àà ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀÄ vÁ¼À ºÁQ Erà ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀªÀ£Éßà CªÀgÀ G½UÀzÁ¼À£ÁßV ¥ÀjªÀwð¸ÀĪÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀßUÀ½UÉ  ¥ÀævÀåPÀëªÁUÀ°Ã ¥ÀgÉÆÃPÀëªÁUÀ°Ã EA§Ä PÉÆqÀĪÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀߪÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁrzÀgÀÄ. MAzÀÄ WÀlÖzÀ°è gÉrØUÀ¼À£ÀÄß  ¤AiÀÄAwæ¸ÀĪÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÉÌ AiÀÄqÉAiÀÄÆgÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀÄ PÉʺÁQzÁUÀ, CªÀgÀ£Éßà ¸ÁÜ£À ¥À®èlªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀߪÀ£ÀÄß gÉrØ UÀÄA¥ÀÄ ªÀiÁrzÀÄzÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄgÉAiÀÄĪÀAw®è. D ºÉÆwÛUÉ ¥ÀPÀëQÌAvÀ vÁªÀÅ zÉÆqÀتÀgÀÄ J£ÀÄߪÀ ªÀÄlÖPÉÌ CªÀgÀÄ ¨É¼ÉzÀÄ ©nÖzÀÝgÀÄ.

       gÉrØ UÀÄA¥À£ÀÄß ¸ÉéÃZÉÒ¬ÄAzÀ ¨É¼É¹zÀÄzÀPÁÌV UÀÄgÀÄvÀgÀªÁzÀ ¨É¯É  vÉvÀÄæªÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ FUÀ  DgÀA¨sÀªÁVzÉ. ªÉÆzÀ®Ä AiÀÄqÉAiÀÄÆgÀ¥Àà£ÀªgÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ PÀ¼ÉzÀÄ PÉÆAqÀgÀÄ. FUÀ ¨sÁd¥À ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ DgÀA¨sÀªÁVªÉ.  Erà §¼Áîj f¯ÉèAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÉrØUÀ½UÉ CqÀ«lÖAvÉ ªÀiÁrz ¥Àæw¥sÀ®ªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀPÀëªÀÅ F G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è C£ÀĨsÀ«¹zÉ. ¥ÀPÀëzÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀvÀðgÉAzÀÄ FUÁUÀ¯Éà ªÉÄgÉzÀªÀgÉ®è gÉrØ UÀÄA¦£À »A¨Á®PÀgÉÃ. G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è CªÀgÉ®è gÉrØAiÀÄgÀ PÀqÉUÉ G½zÀÄzÀjAzÀ, ¨sÁd¥ÀªÀÅ PÁAiÀÄðPÀvÀð C¨sÁªÀªÀ£ÀÄß JzÀÄj¸À¨ÉÃPÁ¬ÄvÀÄ. gÉrØ UÀÄA¦£ÀªÀgÀ UÀÄAqÁVjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤AiÀÄAwæ¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ JAzÀÄ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ zsÀÄjÃtgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀAvÀºÀ zÀAiÀĤÃAiÀÄ ¥Àj¹ÜwÉ ¥ÀPÀëPÉÌ §A¢vÀÄ.

       gÉrØAiÀĪÀgÀ ºÀwægÀ «gÀĪÀ UÀtÂÃUÁjPÉAiÀÄ ºÀt§®ªÉà CªÀgÀ°ègÀĪÀ Cw zÉÆqÀØ C¸ÀæöçªÉA§ÄzÀÄ J®èjUÉ UÉÆwÛgÀĪÀ ¸ÀAUÀw. CªÀgÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼À vÀAvÀæUÁjPÉ »AzÉ EgÀĪÀ «ÄzÀļÀÄ FUÀ ºÀåzÀgÁ¨Á¢£À°ègÀĪÀ d£ÁzÀð£À gÉrØ AiÀĪÀgÉA§ÄzÀÄ UÉÆwÛgÀĪÀ ¸ÀAUÀw. gÁdQÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ ¨ÉA§®«®èzÀ, C¢üPÁgÀ«®èzÀ, ¥ÀæwPÀÆ® ¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÉqÀÄØ ºÉÆqÉzÀÄ ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä dAiÀÄUÀ½¸À ¨ÉÃPÁzÀgÉ,  §jà ºÀt¢AzÀ EµÀÄÖ d£À¨ÉA§®ªÀ£ÀÄß UÀ½¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÉà JA§ ¥Àæ±ÉßAiÀÄÆ PÀÆqÀ , gÉrØAiÀĪÀgÀ UÀÄA¦£ÀªÀgÀÄ ªÁ¹¸ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ CgÀªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄAvÀgÀ ªÀÄ£ÉUÀ¼À ¸ÀÄvÀÛ §A¢gÀĪÀ PÉÆÃqÉAiÀĵÀÄÖ JvÀægÀzÀ PÁA¥ËAqÀ UÉÆÃqÉUÀ¼ÀµÉÖà ¤UÀÆqsÀªÁVzÉ.  CªÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðªÉÊRjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CxÀð ªÀiÁrPÉƼÀÄîªÀzÀÄ  ¸ÀÄ®¨szÀ PÁAiÀÄðªÀ°è JA§ ¥ÀjeÁÕ£À §gÀvÉÆqÀVzÉ.

       G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¸À«ÄÃPÉë ªÀiÁqÀĪÁUÀ JzÀÄgÁzÀ MAzÀÄ zÉÆqÀØ ¥Àæ±Éß JAzÀgÉ ªÉÆzÀ® ¨Áj ¥ÀPÀëzÀ £ÉgÀ«®èzÉà ¸Àà¢üð¹gÀĪÀ  ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀgÀ §®ªÀ£ÀÄß C¼ÉAiÀÄĪÀzÀÄ ºÉUÉ? J£ÀÄߪÀzÀÄ.  2004gÀ°è  CªÀgÀÄ PÀtzÀ°è E®èzÁUÀ (¨ÉÃgÉ ªÀÄvÀPÉëÃvÀæ¢AzÀ CªÀgÀÄ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ ¥ÀgÀ ¸Àà¢üð¹zÀÝgÀÄ) ¨sÁd¥ÀPÉÌ §AzÀ ªÀÄvÀUÀ½VAvÀ 24,000 ºÉZÀÄÑ ªÀÄvÀ CAzÀgÉ 61,000 ªÀÄvÀ ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀgÀÄ 2008gÀ°è UÀ½¹zÀÝgÀÄ. »ÃUÉ §AzÀ ªÀÄvÀzÀ°è ¥ÀPÀëzÀ ¥Á¯ÉµÀÄÖ, ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀgÀ ¥Á®Ä JµÀÄÖ JAzÀÄ «AUÀr¸À®Ä ¸ÁzsÀå«gÀ°®è.  »A¢£À ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è §AzÀ ªÀÄvÀUÀ¼Éà ¥ÀPÀëzÀ ªÀÄvÀUÀ¼ÉA§ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀiÁrzÀ  G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ ¨sÀ«vÀªÀåzÀ CAzÁdÄ ¯ÉPÀÌPÉÌ §gÀzÀ jÃwAiÀÄ°è vÀ¦àºÉÆÃzÀÄzÀPÉÌ PÁgÀt.

       ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀ ¸ASÉåAiÀÄ°è AiÀiÁªÀ UÀt¤ÃAiÀÄ §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ E®è¢zÀÝgÀÆ G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 13,000 zÀµÀÄÖ ºÉaÝ£À ªÀÄvÀzÁ£ÀªÁVzÀÄzÀÄ PÀÆqÀ ZÀZÉðUÉ UÁæ¸À MzÀV¹vÀÄ. FUÀ ªÀÄvÀUÀ¼À JtÂPÉAiÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ ºÉÆgÀ©zÀÝ ¸ÀAUÀwAiÉÄAzÀgÉ ¨sÁd¥ÀzÀ ªÀÄvÀUÀ¼ÀÄ F PÉëÃvÀæzÀ°è PÉêÀ® 17,000 – (EzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀ ¸ÀASÉåAiÀÄ°è£À PÉêÀ® 10% ªÀiÁvÀ. EµÀÖ£ÀÄß UÀ½¹zÉÞà zÉÆqÀØ ¸ÁzsÀ£É JAzÀÄ  ¥ÀPÀëzÀ CzsÀåPÀë F±ÀégÀ¥Àà ºÉüÀÄvÁægÉ). PÁAUÉæ¹UÉ §A¢zÀÄÝ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 27,000 – PÀ¼ÉzÀ ¨ÁjVAv 10,000 ªÀÄvÀUÀ¼À SÉÆÃvÁ CªÀjUÉ. CzÀgÉ §zÀ¯ÁV ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä gÀªÀjUÉ 74,527 ªÀÄvÀUÀ¼ÀÄ –ZÀ¯ÁªÀuÉAiÀiÁzÀ ªÀÄvÀUÀ¼À°è ±Éà 60gÀµÀÄÖ CªÀgÀ ¥Á°UÉ.  MlÄÖ 1.72 ®PÀë  ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀjgÀĪÀ D PÉëÃvÀæzÀ°è ²æÃgÁªÀÄÄ®Ä CªÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ 43% ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹zÁÝgÉ. CzÉÆAzÀÄ KPÀ ¥ÀQëÃAiÀÄ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ. ºÁUÁzÀgÉ EªÀgÀ d£À¨ÉA§®zÀ UÀÄmÉÖãÀÄ? §j ºÀt§®¢AzÀ d£À ¨ÉA§® ¹UÀĪÀzÀÄ ¸ÁzsÀåªÉÃ? EzÀPÉÌ  GvÀægÀ ¹PÀÄ̪ÀzÀÄ PÀµÀÖ.

(ªÀÄÄV¬ÄvÀÄ) 

Capable but unlucky

ªÀÄwÛúÀ½î ªÀÄzÀ£À ªÉÆúÀ£À,    ¸ÀA¥ÁzÀQÃ0iÀÄ  ¸À®ºÉUÁgÀgÀÄ, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAPÀtPÁgÀgÀÄ

 zÀÆ ªÁ: 2374872 ªÉÆ: 94480-74872

Email: mathihallim@yahoo.co.in./  madan.mm@gmail.com

                                                       

                                                         

ªÀåQÛ  avÀæ:  «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîÛ

       

        PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄÆgÀ£ÉAiÀÄ  ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C«¨sÀfvÀ PÁAUÉæ¹£À PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è£À PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæ  ¢.  «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ vÀ¯ÉªÀiÁj£À PÁAUÉæ¹UÀgÀ°è ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæ¥ÀzÀzÀ UÀÄjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀ®Ä¦zÀ ªÉÆz°UÀgÀÄ. (JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀĪÀgÀÄ zsÀªÀÄð¹AUÀ, CªÀgÀ ¸ÀgÀ¢ §AzÀzÀÄÝ 2004gÀ°è). Cwà »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀªÁzÀ ºÉÊzÀgÁ¨ÁzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀªÀÅ PÀ£ÁðlPÀPÉÌ  ¤ÃrzÀ zÉÆqÀØ PÉÆqÀÄUÉ.

        ¥ÁnîgÀ ªÀgÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ fêÀ£ÀªÀÅ K¼ÀÄ ©Ã¼ÀÄUÀ¼À «Ä±Àæt. MAzÀÄ jÃw¬ÄAzÀ £ÉÆÃrzÀgÉ M§â zÀÄzÉÊð« gÁdPÁgÀtÂ. zÀPÀëgÁzÀgÀÆ CªÀPÁ±À ªÀAavÀ. §gÀĪÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀU½UÉ §gÀ«gÀ°®è.  DzÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀªÀÅ CªÀjUÉ §ºÀ¼À ¢ªÀ¸À zÀPÀÄÌwÛgÀ°®è. AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÆà MAzÀÄ PÁgÀt¢AzÀ PÉʬÄAzÀ eÁj ºÉÆÃVªÉ.  CªÀjUÉ DzÀzÀÄÝ  §®ªÀAvÀzÀ ¤UÀðªÀÄ£. £ÀAvÀgÀ vÀªÀÄä ±ÉõÁAiÀÄĵÀåªÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÆêÀÅ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ¹ £É£À¥ÀÄUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ PÀ¼ÉAiÀÄ ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ C¤ªÁAiÀÄðvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß JzÀÄj¹zÀªÀgÀÄ.

        MªÉÄä ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ ¥ÀzÀ ¹UÀĪÀzÉà zÀĸÀægÀªÁzÁUÀ, JgÀqÀÄ ¨Áj CzÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀ PÉ®ªÉà PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ gÁdPÁgÀtÂUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÉƧâgÀÄ. DzÀgÉ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà,  zÉêÀgÁd CgÀ¸À gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ ºÉUÀqÉAiÀĪÀgÀAvÉ CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ MAzÀÄ ªÀÄÄVAiÀÄÄwÛzÀÝAvÉ E£ÉÆßAzÀÄ §gÀ°®è. JgÀqÀÄ CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À £ÀqÀÄªÉ ºÀ¢£ÉAlÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢ü £ÀĸÀĽvÀÄæ. EAvÀºÀ ¢ÃWÀð CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ªÀgÉUÉ vÀªÀÄä gÁdQÃAiÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß G½¹PÉÆAqÀÄ §AzÀzÀÄÝ ªÀiÁvÀæ CªÀgÀ ºÉZÀÄÑUÁjPÉ..

        JgÀqÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀiÁzÀgÀÆ J°èAiÀÄÆ CªÀjUÉ ¥ÀÆuÁðªÀ¢ü EgÀ®Ä DUÀ°®è,.. gÁdQÃAiÀÄzÀ°è£À ¹ÜvÀåAvÀgÀU¼ÀÄ ºÀ¢Ý£ÀAvÉ CªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É JgÀV CªÀgÀ PÉÊAiÀÄ°è EzÀÝ vÀÄvÀÛ£ÀÄß PÀ¹zÀÄ PÉÆAqÀAvÉ CªÀgÀ ¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀiÁVvÀÄæ. CªÀgÀAvÉ JgÀqÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ ¥ÀzÀªÀ£ÀÄß C®APÀj¹zÀ (¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀzÀÄ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ¨Áj), ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà, zÉêÀgÁd CgÀ¸ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ ºÉUÀqÉAiÀĪÀgÉ®è  PÀ¤µÀ× LzÀÄ ªÀµÀðQÌAvÀ ºÉaÑ£À CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ° gÁdå¨sÁgÀ ªÀiÁrzÀgÉ  (Cw ºÉaÑ£À JAlÄ ªÀµÀðzÀ CªÀ¢ü ¹QÌzÀÄÝ zÉêÀgÁd CgÀ¸ÀgÀÄ) æ ¥ÁnîjUÉ ®¨sÀåªÁzÀÄzÀÄ  PÉêÀ® ªÀÄÆgÀÆ ªÀÄÄPÁÌ®Ä ªÀµð ªÀiÁvÀæ.

        ¥ÁnîjUÉ ªÉÆzÀ® CªÀPÁ±À §AzÀzÀÄÝ 1968gÀ°è. 1967gÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀiÁzÀ MAzÀÄ ªÀµÀðzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ªÀÄÆgÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀiÁV C¢üPÁgÀ ¹éÃPÀj¹zÀÝ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀjUÉ ºÉƸÀ¢°è¬ÄAzÀ §Ä¯Áªï §A¢vÀÄ. ¥ÀPÀëzÀ gÁµÁÖçzsÀåPÀëgÀ ºÉÆuÉ ºÉÆgÀ®Ä CªÀgÀÄ ¢°èUÉ vÉgÀ½zÀgÀÄ.   CªÀgÀ GvÀægÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ UÀzÀÄÝUÉ KjzÀgÀÄ. ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ §®UÀå §AlgÉAzÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdPÁgÀtzÀ ®ªÀ PÀıÀgÉAzÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ¥ÀqÉzÀ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥Ánî ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ ºÉUÀqÉ zÀéAiÀÄgÀ°è, ®ªÀ¤UÉ CzÀȵÀÖ ®Qëöä DUÀ M°zÀgÉ, PÀıÀ£ÀÄ vÀ£Àß CªÀPÁ±ÀPÁÌV E£ÀÆß ºÀ¢£ÉÊzÀÄ ªÀµÀð PÁAiÀĨÉÃPÁ¬ÄvÀÄ.

        DUÀ ¥ÁnîjUÉ   £Á®ÄÌ ªÀµÀðzÀ CªÀ¢ü. CzÀ£ÀÄ C¨Á¢üvÀªÁV ¥ÀÆgÉʸÀĪÀzÀPÉÌ AiÀiÁªÀ PÀAlPÀUÀ¼ÀÆ EgÀ°®è. DzÀgÉ ¢ürÃgÀ£É §AzÀ PÁAUÉæ¹£À «¨sÀd£É CªÀgÀ J®è D±ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß  ¨sÀUÀß ªÀiÁrvÀÄ. CA¢£À PÁAUÉæ¸À CzsÀåPÀëgÁzÀ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ §AqÉzÀÝ EA¢gÁUÁA¢ü PÁAUÉæ¸À£ÀÄß ºÉÆüÀÄ ªÀiÁrzÁUÀ, «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉVzÀÝgÀÄ. 1971gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ UÀÄA¥ÀÄ ¥ÀgÁdAiÀÄ UÉÆAqÁU, PÁAUÉæ¸À ±Á¸ÀPÀgÀ°è §ºÀÄvÉÃPÀgÀÄ EA¢gÁ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV ªÁ°zÁUÀ, ¥ÀzÀvÁåUÀ ªÀiÁqÀzÉà ¥ÁnîjUÉ UÀvÀåAvÀgÀ«gÀ°®è.  CªÀgÀ CªÀ¢ü E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ªÀµÀð ¥ÀÆwðAiÀiÁVgÀ°®è.

        JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀiÁzÀzÀÄÝ 1989gÀ°è. D ¥ÀzÀªÀ£ÀÄß»rAiÀÄ®Ä CªÀgÀÄ AiÀiÁgÀ ªÀÄfð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ D²ÃªÁðzÀUÀ½UÉ PÁAiÀĨÉÃPÁVgÀ°®. CzÀÄ d£ÀUÀ¼À ¤zsÁðgÀªÁVvÀÄÛ.  CªÀgÀÄ  ¥ÀæzÉñÀ PÁAUÉæ¸ÀzÀ PÀtðzsÁgÀvÀé ªÀ»¹, ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉUÉ ºÉÆÃzÁUÀ, ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ CvÀ ºÉaÑ£À ªÀÄÆgÀÄ-£Á¯ÁÌA±À §ºÀĪÀÄvÀ PÉÆlÄÖ PÁAUÉ渣ÀÄß C¢üPÁgÀzÀvÀæ  PÉÆAqÉÆAiÀÄÝgÀÄ.. DzÀgÉ CA¢£À ¥ÀæzsÁ¤ gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ PÉAUÀtÂÚUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁUÀ ºÀ£ÉÆßAzÀÄ wAUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀzÀPÉÌ «zÁAiÀÄ ºÉüÀ¨ÉÃPÁ¬ÄvÀÄ. M§â £Á®ä£ÉAiÀÄ zÀeÉð vÉUÉAiÀįÁgÀzÀµÀÄÖ »Ã£ÁAiÀĪÁV gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ¥ÁnîgÀ£ÀÄß £ÀqɹPÉÆAqÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄgÉAiÀÄĪÀAw®è. . ¥ÁnîjUÉ CzÉà ¥Á±ÀéðªÁAiÀÄÄ DVvÀÄÛ. ªÉÄïÁV ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¸ÀÄvÀÛªÀÄÄvÀÛ®Ä PÁAUÉæ¹£À PÉ® zsÀÄjÃtgÀ PÀÄvÀAvÀæ¢AzÀ ªÀÄwÃAiÀÄ UÀ®¨sÉ £ÀqÉ¢vÀÄÛ. ¥ÁnîgÀ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ CzÀ£ÀÄ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀiÁqÀĪÀzÀgÀ°è ¤gÀvÀªÁzÁUÀ, ¥ÁnîgÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄ£ÉUÉ PÀ½¸ÀĪÀzÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ zÀ ¥ÀæªÁ¸À ªÀÄÄV¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ªÀÄgÀ½°zÀÝ gÁfêÀ UÁA¢ü «ªÀiÁ£À ¤¯ÁÑtzÀ°è EzÀ£ÀÄß ªÀgÀ¢UÁgÀjUÉ w½¹ «ªÀiÁ£ÀzÀ°è ºÁjºÉÆÃzÀgÀÄ. EAvÀºÀ ªÀĺÀvÀézÀ ¸ÀÄ¢ÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀåQÛUvÀ w½¸À¨ÉÃPÉ£ÀÄߪÀ ªÀÄÆ® ¨sÀÆvÀ ¸Ëd£ÀåªÀ£ÀÆß gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀÄ vÉÆÃj¸À¢gÀĪÀzÀÄ zÉÆqÀتÀgÀ°ègÀĪÀ ¸ÀtÚvÀ£ÀzÀ ¤zÀ±Àð£À.Û.

        gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄäzÉà DzÀ PÁgÀtPÉÌ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀ£ÀÄ zÀAr¹gÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ. DzÀgÉ CzÀgÀ ±ÉSÉ vÀUÀ°zÀÄÝ PÀ£ÁðlPÀPÉÌ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁAUÉæ¸À ¥ÀPÀëPÉÌ.  «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîjUÀAvÀÆ DzÀ DWÁvÀ C¥ÁgÀ.  CzÀgÀ  ºÉÆqÉvÀ¢AzÀ CªÀjUÉ ¨ÉÃUÀ ZÉÃvÀj¹PÉƼÀî®Ä  CUÀ°®è. §ºÀĪÀÄvÀ«zÀÝgÀÆ, PÁAUÉæ¹UÉ ªÀÄÄA¢£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀĨsÀzÀæ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ PÉÆqÀ®Ä DUÀ°®è. ªÀÄvÉÛgÀqÀÄ ¨Áj PÁAUÉæ¸À ªÀjµÀ× ªÀÄAqÀ½ £ÁAiÀÄPÀvÀé §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ ªÀiÁrzÀgÉ, ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è PÁAUÉæ¸À£ÀÄß ªÀÄ£ÉUÉ PÀ½¹zÀgÀÄ.

        EzÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÆ® PÁgÀtªÉAzÀgÉ GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ PÀtät AiÉÄAzÉà ¥Àæ¹zÀÞgÁVzÀÝ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥Án®jUÁzÀ CªÀªÀiÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄ vÀªÀÄUÁzÀ CªÀªÀiÁ£ÀªÉAzÉà GvÀægÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹, , PÁAUÉæ¹zÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è vÀPÀÌ ²PÉëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆlÖgÀÄ. CAzÀÄ PÀ¼ÉzÀÄ PÉÆArzÀÝ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀ £ÀA©PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÁAUÉæ¸À EA¢UÀÆ ªÀÄgÀ½ UÀ½¸À¯ÁV®è. DqÀ½vÀzÀ°è CªÀgÀÄ ±ÀÄgÀĪÀiÁrzÀ zÀPÀëvÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀªÀð CªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ £ÉÃ¥ÀxÀPÉÌ  ¸Àj¬ÄvÀÄ.

        ¹PÀÌ C¯ÁàªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°èAiÉÄà vÁªÀÅ zÀPÀë CqÀ½vÀUÁgÀgÉAzÀÄ vÉÆÃj¹zÀÄzÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀ ºÉZÀÄÑUÁjPÉ.   .        »AzÀĽzÀ vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀgÀÄ f¯ÉèAiÀiÁzÀ PÀ®§ÄVðAiÀÄ°èAiÉÄà Cw »AzÀĽzÀ vÁ®ÆPÁzÀ aAZÉÆýAiÉÄà EªÀgÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ PÉëÃvÀæ. E°è¬ÄAzÀ CªÀgÀÄ JAzÀÆ ¸ÉÆî°®è. F PÉëÃvÀæªÀ£À£ÀÄ ©lÄÖ EvÀgÉqÉUÉ CªÀgÀÄ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ ¤AwzÀÄÝ MAzÀÄ ¨Áj ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ ZÀÄ£ÁÀªÀuÉUÉ ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃl¢AzÀ ¸Àà¢üð¹zÁUÀ ªÀiÁvÀæ.

        ¸ÁzÁUÀ¥ÀÄà §tÚzÀ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ «ÄvÀ¨sÁ¶. G½zÀªÀgÀAvÉ ºÀgÀmÉ ¦æAiÀÄgÀ®è. gÁdå ¤ªÀiÁðtªÁzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ CªÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÉëÃvÀæªÁzÁUÀ CªjUÉ  ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ ªÉÆzÀ® ªÀÄAwæ ªÀÄAqÀ¼ÀzÀ°è zÉÆgÀQzÀÄÝ G¥ÀªÀÄAwæ ¸ÁÜ£À ªÀiÁvÀæ..  CªÀgÀ ¥ÀjZÀAiÀÄ §ºÀ¼À ªÀÄA¢UÉ EgÀ°®è. .  ºÉÊzÉgÁ¨ÁzÀzÀ G¸Áä¤AiÀiÁ «±Àé«zÁå®AiÀÄzÀ°è GzÀÄðzÀ°è N¢ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ¥ÀzÀ« ¥ÀqÉzÀ CªÀgÀÄ PÀ£ÀßqÀ EAVèõÀUÀ½VAvÀ ¸À°Ã¸ÁV GzÀÄð zÀ°è ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁqÀĪÀAvÀºÀgÀÄ. CªÀgÀ GzÀÄð «Ä²ævÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀ MªÉÆäªÉÄä PÉüÀÄUÀjUÉ  CxÀðªÁUÀÄwÛgÀ°®è. MAzÀÄ vÀgÀºÀzÀ M¼ÀªÀÄÄT ¸Àé¨sÁªÀ CªÀgÀzÀÄ.

        CªÀgÀ ¸ÁªÀÄxÀåðzÀ CjªÀÅ ªÀÄÆqÀ®Ä ±ÀÄgÀĪÁzÀÄzÀÄ, ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀÄ ¥ÀæzÉñÀ PÁAUÉæ¸À CzsÀåPÀëgÁzÀ PÁ®zÀ°è, EªÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EªÀgÀ ¸ÀºÉÆÃzÉÆåÃV ²æà gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ  ºÉUÀqÉAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ¥ÀæzÉñÀ PÁAUÉæ¹£À ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð UÀ¼ÉAzÀÄ £ÉêÀÄPÀUÉÆAqÁUÀ. CA¢£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀPÀëzÀ ¸ÀAWÀl£ÉUÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ  ©. r  dwÛAiÀĪÀgÀ £ÉÃvÀÈvÀézÀ°è£À ¥ÀPÀëzÀ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ ¨ÁAzsÀªÀåªÀÅ ªÀÄzsÀÄgÀªÁVgÀ°®è. ¥ÀPÀëªÀÅ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ PÀqÉUÉ EzÀÝgÉ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ dwAiÀĪÀgÀ UÀÄA¦£À PÉÊAiÀÄ°è EvÀÄÛ. JgÀqÀÄ UÀÄA¥ÀÄUÀ¼À £ÀqÀÄªÉ zÀĸÀÄzÀĸÀÄ £ÀqÉÀzÉà EvÀÄÛ. ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁVzÀÝ  ºÀgÀ¥À£ÀºÀ½î, £ÀgÀUÀÄAzÀ ªÉÆzÀ¯ÁzÀ «zsÁ£À ¸À¨sÁ ªÀÄvÀPÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼ÀªÀ£ÀÄß gÁdQÃAiÀÄ PÁgÀtPÁÌV «ÄøÀ®Ä PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß  dwÛ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ ªÀiÁrzÀgÉ, Erà ¥ÀæzÉñÀ PÁAUÉæ¸À£ÀÄß ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV  ¥ÀjªÀwð¹zÀªÀgÀ°è ¥Ánî ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉUÀqÉAiÀĪÀgÀ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄRgÀÄ.

  .      ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà £ÀªÀgÀ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ°è ¥Ánî ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉUÀqÉ zÀéAiÀÄgÀÄ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀ»¹PÉÆArzÀÝgÀÄ. ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÉÆÃ¥ÀAiÉÆÃV SÁvÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁVzÀÝgÀÄ. EA¢£ÀAvÉ F SÁvÉ CAzÀÄ ºÀjzÀÄ ºÀAa ºÉÆÃVgÀ°®è.  ¥ÀæªÀÄÄRªÁzÀ ¤ÃgÁªÀj SÁvÉAiÀÄÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÉÆ¥ÀAiÉÆÃV SÁvÉAiÀÄ CAUÀªÁVvÀÄÛ. CA¢£À J®è ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR UÀÄwÛUÉ zÁgÀgÉ®è ¯ÉÆÃPÉÆ¥ÀAiÉÆÃV E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ D¢üãÀzÀ°è §gÀÄwæzÀÝgÀÄ.  ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ GvÁægÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁUÀĪÀ  §UÉUÉ ¥ÉÊ¥ÉÆÃn ±ÀÄgÀĪÁzÁUÀ, ¥ÁnîgÀ PÉÊÉ §®¥r¸ÀĪÀ°è  UÀÄwÛUÉzÁgÀ §¼ÀUÀªÀÇ ¥ÁvÀæ ªÀ»¹vÀÄÛ J£ÀÄߪÀ  ªÀiÁvÀÄ CA¢£À gÁdPÁgÀtzÀ°è §ºÀ¼À d£Àd¤vªÁVvÀÄÛ.

        1956 gÀ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ 1968gÀ°è §zÀ°AiÀiÁVzÀÝgÀÄ. PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è£À ºÀ£ÉßgÀqÀÄ ªÀµÀðzÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ C£ÀĨsÀªÀ MqÀ£Ál CªÀgÀ ªÀåQÛvÀézÀ°è, £ÀqÉ£ÀÄrAiÀÄ°è §ºÀ¼À §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ vÀA¢gÀĪÀzÀÄ d£ÀgÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §gÀzÉà EgÀ°®è. . ºÉÊzÀgÁ¨ÁzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀzÀ MgÀlÄ ¨ÁóµÉAiÀÄ ¸ÉÆUÀqÀÄ ªÀiÁAiÀĪÁV, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ EvÀgÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼ d£ÀgÉÆqÀ£É ¸À°Ã¸ÁV ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁqÀĪÀµÀÄÖ CªÀgÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀzÀ°è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀiÁw£À°è ¥ÀjªÀvÀð£ÉAiÀiÁVvÀÄÛ., GvÀÛªÀÄ ¨sÁµÀtPÁgÀgÁUÀ¢zÀÝgÀÆ, ºÉüÀĪÀzÀ£ÀÄß aPÀÌzÁV ZÉÆPÀÌzÁV, ªÁ¸ÀÛ«PÀ  £É¯UÀnÖ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉüÀĪÀ P¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀÄ gÀÆrü¹UÉÆArzÀÝgÀÄ. CªÀjUÉ ¥ÀjtwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¨É¼É¹PÉÆArzÀÝgÀÄ.   ¥ÀwæPÁ UÉÆöÖUÀ¼À°è ºÉüÀĪÀzÉ®èªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀàÀµÀÖªÁV AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÉúÀPÀÆÌ CªÀPÁ±À PÉÆqÀzÀAvÉ ºÉüÀĪÀ ¸Àé¨sÁªÀ CªÀgÀzÀÄ.  AiÀiÁªÀ ªÀiÁw£À°èAiÀiÁUÀ°Ã, DqÀ½vÁvÀäPÀ, zsÉÆÃgÀuÁvÀäPÀ CxÀªÁ gÁdQÃAiÀĪÁVgÀ°,  AiÀiÁªÀÅzÀgÀ°èAiÀÄÆ  CªÀgÀÄ C£ÁªÀ±ÀåPÀªÁV ¹QÌ ºÁQPÉƼÀÄîwÛgÀ°®è.    

        PÁAUÉæ¹£À «¨sÀd£É¬ÄAzÁV, ªÉÆzÀ® ¨Áj vÀªÀÄä ¥ÀPÀëzÀÝÀ®èzÀ PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÉÆqÀ£É gÁdå ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀªÀÅ ªÀåªÀºÁgÀªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¥Àj¹Üw  «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîjUÉ §AzÉÆzÀVvÀÄ. P£ÁðlPÀ  ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀªÀÅ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ £ÉÃvÀÈvÀézÀ ¸ÀA¸ÁÜ PÁAUÉæ¹£À ¥ÀgÀ G½zÀgÉ PÉÃAzÀæzÀ°è  §AqÉzÀÝ EA¢gÁUÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ CqÀ½vÀ«vÀÄÛ. PÀwÛAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÁªÀÄĪÀiÁqÀĪÀAvÀºÀ ¸ÀÆPÀëöä ¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀÄ°èAiÀÄÆ, AiÀiÁªÀ C£ÁªÀ±ÀåPÀ nÃPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀiÁqÀzÉÃ, «ªÉÃZÀ£É PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉƼÀèzÉà ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁqÀĪÀzÀgÀ°è, ªÀ媺Àj¸ÀĪÀ°è CªÀgÀÄ ¥ÀjtÂvÀgÀÄ. Ä. 1971gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è EA¢gÁ PÁAUÉæ¸À gÁdåzÀ°èAiÀÄÆ dAiÀĨsÉÃj ¨Áj¹zÀÄzÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV, PÁAUÉæ¸À ±Á¸ÀPÀgÀ M®ªÀÅ EA¢gÁ PÁAUÉæ¸À ¥ÀgÀªÁV vÉÆÃjzÁUÀ, «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ PɼÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀzÀÄÝ EwºÁ¸À.

        ¥ÁnîgÀ  PÀvÀðªÀå zÀPÀëvÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C£ÁªÀ±ÀåPÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ nÃPÉUÀ¼À°è vÉÆqÀUÀ¢gÀĪÀzÀÄ  EA¢gÁ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §gÀzÉà ºÉÆÃUÀ°®è.  ºÀ®ªÀÅ ¨Áj ¥ÀgÉÆÃPÀëªÁV «ÃgÉAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀ£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä ºÉƸÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ PÀqÉUÉ J¼ÉAiÀÄĪÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀß ªÀiÁrzgÀÆ, vÀªÀÄä ¤µÉ×  §zÀ®ÄªÀiÁqÀ®Ä M¥ÀàzÉÃ, «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ G½zÀgÀÄ. £ÀAvÀgÀ aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è EA¢gÁ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÝ ¸Àà¢üð¹ ¸ÉÆÃvÀgÀÄ.

        DzÀgÉ PÉ®ªÀÅ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è MqÀPÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ §AzÀzÀÆÝ  GAlÄ. GzÁºÀgÀtUÁV vÀÄvÀÄð¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀÄ°è vÀªÀÄä d£ÀvÁ ¥ÀjªÁgÀzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ zsÀÄjÃtgÉ®ègÀÆ ¸ÉgɪÀÄ£ÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀgÀÆ, ¥ÁnîgÀÄ JAzÀÆ §AzsÀ£ÀPÉÌ M¼ÀUÁUÀ°®è.  KPÉ J£ÀÄߪÀzÀgÀ §UÉÎ HºÁ¥ÉÆúÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀgÀrzÀªÉà ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ ¤dªÁzÀ PÁgÀt ºÉÆgÀUÉ §g¯Éà E®è.

        ªÉÆzÀ®Ä EA¢gÁ PÁAUÉæ¸À ¸ÉÃgÀ®Ä ¤gÁPÀj¹zÀ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è CzÉà ¥ÀPÀë ¸ÉÃjzÀÄzÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ §ºÀ¼À d£ÀUÀ½UÉ »r¸À°®è. CªÀgÀ »A¨Á®PÀgÀAvÀÆ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä£ÀÄß £ÀqÀĤÃj£À°è PÉÊ©lÖgÀÄ JAzÀÄ §ºÀ¼ÀªÁV ªÀÄgÀÄVzÀgÀÄ.. ¤µÉ× §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ CªÀjUÉ PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß wgÀÄV vÀAzÀÄPÉÆnÖvÀÄ. ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉUÉ Dj¹ ºÉÆÃzÀgÀÄ  PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁzÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄæ 1989gÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ PÀtðzsÁgÀvÀéªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀ»¹zÀ PÁAUÉæ¸À ªÀÄvÀÛ C¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ªÀiÁr, ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁzÀgÀÆ., EªÀÅ AiÀiÁªÀªÀÅ CªÀgÀÄ ¥PÁëAvÀgÀªÀiÁrzÀ ¥Á¥ÀªÀ£ÀÄß d£ÀgÀ ªÀÄ£À¹ì¤AzÀ vÉÆqÉzÀÄ ºÁP®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀ°®è..  CªÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ ¸Àj¬Ä®è¢zÀÄzÀjAzÀ §AzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÉ®èªÀÇ ¸ÉÆÃj ºÉÆÃzÀÄzÀgÀ ¥ÀjuÁªÀĪÁV CªÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ ¢£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤gÁ±É ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £ÉÆë£ÉÆA¢UÉ PÀ¼ÉAiÀÄÄAvÁ¬ÄvÀÄ.

        CªÀgÀ ¸Àé¨sÁªÀzÀ PÉ®ªÀÅ gÀhÄ®ÄPÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß E°è ºÉüÀ¯Éà ¨ÉÃPÀÄ. CªÀgÉÆqÀ£É §AzÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀwæPÉÆÃzÀå«ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉý.   CªÀgÀ £É£À¦£À ±ÀQ CUÁzsÀ. ºÀ®ªÀÅ wAUÀ¼À »AzÉ vÁªÀÅ GvÀÛj¹zÀ ¥Àæ±ÉßUÀ¼À §UÉUÉ ªÀÄvÉÛ PÉýzÀgÉ, »AzÉ ºÉýzÀÄzÀ£Éß, «gÁªÀÄ, C®à«gÁªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆ PÀÆqÀ vÀ¥ÀàzÀAvÉ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀj¸ÀĪÀ ¸Àé¨sÁªÀ CªÀgzÀÄ.

        CªgÀzÉÆAzÀÄ «avÀæ ¥ÀzÀÞw EvÀÄÛ. . ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¸ÀªÀiÁgÀA¨sÀUÀ¼À°è ¨sÁUÀ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÁUÀ CªÀgÀÄ PÀ¥ÀÄà PÀ£ÀßqÀPÀ zsÀj¸ÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. EzÀÄ »ÃUÉÃPÉ JAzÀÄ ¸À®à vÀ¤SÉ ªÀiÁrzÁUÀ  ºÉÆgÀ §AzÀ ¸ÀAUÀw E£ÀÆß  «avÀæ . CªÀjUÉ ºÉÆUÀ½ªÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß PÀAqÀgÉ §ºÀ¼À C®fð. ¸ÀªÀiÁgÀA¨sÀUÀ¼À°è, CUÀĪÀzÀÄ EzÉãÉAiÉÄÃ.CzÀjAzÀ ¥ÁgÁU®Ä CªÀgÀÄ PÀ¥ÀÄà PÀ£ÀßqÀPÀªÀ£ÀÄß zsÀj¹, ¤zÉæ ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ ¥ÀæwÃw. ºÉÆUÀ½PÉ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄÄVzÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ¨sÁµÀtzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀħAzÀ vÀPÀÌt vÀªÀÄä ªÀiÁvÀÄ DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ vÀ£ÀPÀªÀÇ F UÀÄlÄÖ AiÀiÁjUÀÆ UÉÆwægÀ°®è. EAvÀºÀ G¥ÁAiÀÄ w½AiÀÄzÉ £ÀªÀÄä zÉêÉUËqÀgÀÄ J®èjUÉ PÁtĪÀAvÉ vÀÆPÀr¸ÀÄvÁÛ J®ègÀ ¯ÉêÀrUÉ UÁæ¸À ªÁzÀgÀÄ.

        AiÀiÁgÉà DVgÀ° CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉ C£ÁªÀ±ÀåPÀ ºÀgÀmÉ ºÉÆqÉAiÀÄĪÀzÀÄ CªÀjUÉ ¸ÉÃgÀÄwÛgÀ°®è. JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwÛUÀ¼ÁV §AzÁUÀ  MAzÀÄ ªÉÆÃf£À ¸ÀAUÀw CªÀgÀ zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f¯ÉèAiÀÄ ¸ÀAZÁgÀzÀ°è £ÀqɬÄvÀÄ.  CªÀgÀ JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¢ªÀ¸ÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀëªÀÄ ªÀļÉAiÀÄ ¸À®ÄªÁV ¨ÉÃUÀ ªÀÄÄV¬ÄvÀÄ. CªÀgÀÄ gÁuÉèɣÀÆßj¤AzÀ gÁwæ gÉ樀 ºÀvÀÄæªÀªÀjzÀÝgÀÄ. DzÀgÉ ¸ÀAeÉAiÀÄ ºÉÆwÛUÉ J®ÎªÀÇ ªÀÄÄVzÀÄ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ £Á®ÄÌ vÁ¸ÀÄ ªÉüɠ ®©ü¹vÀÄÛ. gÁuɨɣÀÆßgÀÄ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ ªÀÄA¢gÀzÀ°è d£ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀvÀðgÀÄ QQÌjzÀÝgÀÄ.  CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ªÉÃ¼É PÀ¼ÉAiÀÄĪÀzÀÄ CªÀjUÉ ¨ÉÃqÀªÁVvÉÛãÉÆÃ. CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨É£ÀÄß ºÀwÛ§A¢zÀÝ  ¥ÀvÀæPÀvÀðgÀ°è £Á«§âgÉà CAzÀgÉ £Á£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀAAiÀÄÄPÀÛ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ²æ C£ÀAvÀ VtÂUÉÃj EzÉݪÀÅ.

        QQÌjzÀ À d£À dAUÀĽAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃr, CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉ ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À ¹UÀ°QÌ®èªÉA§ C¼ÀÄQ¤AzÀ¯Éà CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨sÉnÖAiÀiÁUÀ§ºÀÄzÉà  JA§ ¸ÀAzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀ½¹zÁUÀ CzÀPÉÌ CªÀgÀÄ vÀPÀët M¦àzÀgÀÄ. . £Á«zÀÝ PÉÆÃuɬÄAzÀ  EvÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÉ PÀ½¹¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ. £Á«gÀĪÀ°èAiÉÄà CªÀgÀÄ zsÁ«¹zÀgÀÄ. £ÀªÀÄä «gÁªÀĪÁzÀ “ºÀgÀm”  ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ JgqÀÄ vÁ¸ÀÄ ªÉÄïÁVgÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ. . .£À£Àß°èzÀÝ GzÀÝ ¥Àæ±ÉßUÀ¼À ¥nÖ ªÀÄÄV¬ÄvÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆ£ÉUÁt¸À¨ÉÃPÁ¬ÄvÉà ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ CªÀjUÉ ¸ÁPÁ¬ÄvÀÄ JAzÉ®è.      DªÁUÀ gÁwæ ºÀvÀÄÛ UÀAmÉÉAiÀiÁVvÀÄÛ. HlªÀiÁr gÉ樀 »rAiÀÄĪÀµÉÖà CªÀjUÉ ªÉÃ¼É G½¢vÀÄÛ.

        gÁwæ §ºÀ¼ÀªÁzÀÄzÀjAzÀ £À£ÀUÉ ªÀgÀ¢ vÀPÀët PÉÆqÀ®Ä ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ«gÀ°®è.  VtÂUÉÃj M§âgÉà vÀªÀÄä ¥ÉÃ¥ÀjUÉ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrzÀgÀÄ. £Á£ÀĺÀħâ½èUÉ ªÀÄgÀ½ ªÀÄgÀÄ¢ªÀ¸À CzÀ£ÀÄß «ªÀgÀªÁV §gÉzÀÄ PÀ½¹zÉ CzÀgÀ ¥sÀ®ªÁV  ªÀÄgÀÄ¢ªÀ¸À  D¢vÀåªÁgÀz »AzÀÆ ¥ÀwæPÉAiÀÄ°è CzsÀð ¥ÀÄlzÀµÀÄÖ  CªÀgÀ ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ¸ÀÄ¢Ý ¥ÀæPÀlªÁVvÀÄæ. ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀwæPÉAiÀĪÀÅ E®èzÀÝjAzÀ EµÀÄÖ «±ÀzÀ ªÀgÀ¢ PÉÆqÀĪÀ ¸Ë¨sÁUÀå £ÀªÀÄä ¥ÀwæPÉAiÀÄzÁVvÀÄÛ.  AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀƪÀð vÀAiÀiÁj ¬Ä®èzÉ. CPÀ¹äPÀªÁV, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆj£À ºÉÆgÀUÉ C©ªÀÈ¢üÝAiÀÄ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤gÀUÀð¼À ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁrzÀÄÝ  ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CµÀÄÖ ¢ÃWÀð ªÀgÀ¢AiÉÆAzÀÄ CzÀÆ EAVèõÀ ¥ÉÃ¥Àj£À°è §AzzÀÄÝ EA¢UÀÆ zÁR¯ÉAiÀiÁVzÉ.

                E£ÉÆßAzÀÄ CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉV£À ªÀÄgÀAiÀįÁgÀzÀ C£ÀĨsÀªÀªÉAzÀgÉ. CªÀgÀÄ JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁzÀ ¥Àæw ªÁgÀ CªÀgÀ vÀªÀgÀÄ f¯ÉèUÉ §gÀĪÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀëªÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ºÁQPÉƼÀÄîwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. CzÀPÁÌV ¥ÀæwêÁgÀªÀÅ £Á£ÀÄ PÀ®§ÄVðUÉ ºÉÆÃUÀÄwÛzÉÝ. ªÉüÉAiÀÄ ¥Àj¥Á®£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀjAzÀ PÀ°AiÀĨÉÃPÀÄ. JAlÄ UÀAmÉAiÀÄ ºÉÆwÛUÉ vÀªÀÄä ¥ÁvÀ«ð¢üUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄV¹ £ÁåjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄV¹ vÀAiÀiÁgÁV  PÀĽwgÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ.  D ºÉÆwÛUÉ £Á£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £À£Àß ¸ÀºÉÆzÉÆåÃV ²ªÁ£ÀAzÀgÀÄ  CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨sÉÉnÖAiÀiÁUÀĪÀzÀÄ ªÁrPÉ. ªÉÆzÀ¯Éà ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ ¤UÀ¢ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÉA§ PÀlÖ¯ÉAiÀÄÆ EgÀÄwÛgÀ°®è.  D ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨sÉnÖAiÀiÁUÀĪÀ d£ÀgÀÆ PÀrªÉÄ. C  £ÁªÀÅ ºÉÆÃUÀĪÀ D ºÉÆwÛUÉ  CA¢£À  ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß N¢ vÀAiÀiÁgÁVgÀÄwzÀÝgÀÄ.  CªÀgÀÄ £ÀªÀÄä ¥Àæ±ÉßUÀ½UÉ vÀqÀªj¸ÀÀzÉà GvÀÛgÀ PÉÆqÀÄØwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. £À®ªÀvÀÄÛ £À®ªÀvÉÛöÊzÀÄ ¤«ÄµÀ £ÀªÉÆäqÀ£É ªÀiÁvÀ£Ár £ÀAvÀgÀ vÀªÀÄä G½zÀ PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ vÉÆqÀUÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ F ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸Á¢ü¸À¯ÁUÀzÀ £À£Àß ß  EvÀgÀ £À£Àß ªÀÈwÛ ¨ÁAzsÀªÀgÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ §AzÀÄ £ÀªÀÄUÉ ºÉýzÀÄzÀ£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄUÀÆ ºÉüÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ UÀAlÄ ©zÁÝUÀ,  ¥ÁnîgÀÄ “K£ÉÆÃ¥Àà CªÀgÉãÉÆà PÉýzÀgÀÄ. £Á£ÀÄ ºÉýzÉ. ¤ÃªÀÅ PÉý ¤ªÀÄUÀÆ ºÉüÀÄvÉÛãɔ JAzÀÄ vÀ¦à¹ PÉƼÀÄîwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. £ÀªÀÄUÉ ºÉýzÀ AiÀiÁªÀ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß vÁªÁVAiÉÄà CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁܦzÉÃ, £ÁªÀÅ PÉýzÀ ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄä ¥ÉÃ¥ÀjUÉ «ÄøÀ®Ä EqÀĪºÁUÉAiÀÄÆ CªÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ.

        CªÀgÀAvÀºÀ C£ÀĨsÀ« ªÀÄvÀÄæ zÀPÀëgÀ ªÀiÁUÀzÀ±Àð£À PÀ£ÁðlPÀPÉÌ ºÉZÀÄÑPÁ® ¹QÌzÀÝgÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ¨sÀ«vÀªÀå JµÀÄÖ Gd鮪ÁUÀ §ºÀÄ¢vÀÄÛ J£ÀÄßߪÀzÀÄ  æ“gÉÃ¥s” ¸ÁªÀiÁædåPÉÌ ¸ÉÃjzÀ «µÀAiÀÄ. MAzÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ ¤d. CzÀjAzÀ £ÀµÀÖªÁVgÀĪÀzÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀPÉÌ  ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ ¥ÁnîgÀ®è.  CAvÀºÀgÀÄ  FUÀ ºÀUÀ°£À°è ¢Ã¥À ºÀaÑ ºÀÄqÀÄQzÀgÀÆ ¹UÀĪÀ¢®è.

 (ªÀÄÄV¬ÄvÀÄ) 29.11.11

         

       

       

            

Capable but unlucky

ªÀÄwÛúÀ½î ªÀÄzÀ£À ªÉÆúÀ£À,    ¸ÀA¥ÁzÀQÃ0iÀÄ  ¸À®ºÉUÁgÀgÀÄ, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAPÀtPÁgÀgÀÄ

 zÀÆ ªÁ: 2374872 ªÉÆ: 94480-74872

Email: mathihallim@yahoo.co.in./  madan.mm@gmail.com

                                                       

                                                         

ªÀåQÛ  avÀæ:  «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîÛ

       

        PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄÆgÀ£ÉAiÀÄ  ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C«¨sÀfvÀ PÁAUÉæ¹£À PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è£À PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæ  ¢.  «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ vÀ¯ÉªÀiÁj£À PÁAUÉæ¹UÀgÀ°è ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæ¥ÀzÀzÀ UÀÄjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀ®Ä¦zÀ ªÉÆz°UÀgÀÄ. (JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀĪÀgÀÄ zsÀªÀÄð¹AUÀ, CªÀgÀ ¸ÀgÀ¢ §AzÀzÀÄÝ 2004gÀ°è). Cwà »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀªÁzÀ ºÉÊzÀgÁ¨ÁzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀªÀÅ PÀ£ÁðlPÀPÉÌ  ¤ÃrzÀ zÉÆqÀØ PÉÆqÀÄUÉ.

        ¥ÁnîgÀ ªÀgÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ fêÀ£ÀªÀÅ K¼ÀÄ ©Ã¼ÀÄUÀ¼À «Ä±Àæt. MAzÀÄ jÃw¬ÄAzÀ £ÉÆÃrzÀgÉ M§â zÀÄzÉÊð« gÁdPÁgÀtÂ. zÀPÀëgÁzÀgÀÆ CªÀPÁ±À ªÀAavÀ. §gÀĪÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀU½UÉ §gÀ«gÀ°®è.  DzÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀªÀÅ CªÀjUÉ §ºÀ¼À ¢ªÀ¸À zÀPÀÄÌwÛgÀ°®è. AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÆà MAzÀÄ PÁgÀt¢AzÀ PÉʬÄAzÀ eÁj ºÉÆÃVªÉ.  CªÀjUÉ DzÀzÀÄÝ  §®ªÀAvÀzÀ ¤UÀðªÀÄ£. £ÀAvÀgÀ vÀªÀÄä ±ÉõÁAiÀÄĵÀåªÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÆêÀÅ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ¹ £É£À¥ÀÄUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ PÀ¼ÉAiÀÄ ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ C¤ªÁAiÀÄðvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß JzÀÄj¹zÀªÀgÀÄ.

        MªÉÄä ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ ¥ÀzÀ ¹UÀĪÀzÉà zÀĸÀægÀªÁzÁUÀ, JgÀqÀÄ ¨Áj CzÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀ PÉ®ªÉà PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ gÁdPÁgÀtÂUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÉƧâgÀÄ. DzÀgÉ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà,  zÉêÀgÁd CgÀ¸À gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ ºÉUÀqÉAiÀĪÀgÀAvÉ CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ MAzÀÄ ªÀÄÄVAiÀÄÄwÛzÀÝAvÉ E£ÉÆßAzÀÄ §gÀ°®è. JgÀqÀÄ CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼À £ÀqÀÄªÉ ºÀ¢£ÉAlÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À PÁ¯ÁªÀ¢ü £ÀĸÀĽvÀÄæ. EAvÀºÀ ¢ÃWÀð CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ªÀgÉUÉ vÀªÀÄä gÁdQÃAiÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß G½¹PÉÆAqÀÄ §AzÀzÀÄÝ ªÀiÁvÀæ CªÀgÀ ºÉZÀÄÑUÁjPÉ..

        JgÀqÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀiÁzÀgÀÆ J°èAiÀÄÆ CªÀjUÉ ¥ÀÆuÁðªÀ¢ü EgÀ®Ä DUÀ°®è,.. gÁdQÃAiÀÄzÀ°è£À ¹ÜvÀåAvÀgÀU¼ÀÄ ºÀ¢Ý£ÀAvÉ CªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É JgÀV CªÀgÀ PÉÊAiÀÄ°è EzÀÝ vÀÄvÀÛ£ÀÄß PÀ¹zÀÄ PÉÆAqÀAvÉ CªÀgÀ ¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀiÁVvÀÄæ. CªÀgÀAvÉ JgÀqÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ ¥ÀzÀªÀ£ÀÄß C®APÀj¹zÀ (¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀzÀÄ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ¨Áj), ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà, zÉêÀgÁd CgÀ¸ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ ºÉUÀqÉAiÀĪÀgÉ®è  PÀ¤µÀ× LzÀÄ ªÀµÀðQÌAvÀ ºÉaÑ£À CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ° gÁdå¨sÁgÀ ªÀiÁrzÀgÉ  (Cw ºÉaÑ£À JAlÄ ªÀµÀðzÀ CªÀ¢ü ¹QÌzÀÄÝ zÉêÀgÁd CgÀ¸ÀgÀÄ) æ ¥ÁnîjUÉ ®¨sÀåªÁzÀÄzÀÄ  PÉêÀ® ªÀÄÆgÀÆ ªÀÄÄPÁÌ®Ä ªÀµð ªÀiÁvÀæ.

        ¥ÁnîjUÉ ªÉÆzÀ® CªÀPÁ±À §AzÀzÀÄÝ 1968gÀ°è. 1967gÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀiÁzÀ MAzÀÄ ªÀµÀðzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ªÀÄÆgÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀiÁV C¢üPÁgÀ ¹éÃPÀj¹zÀÝ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀjUÉ ºÉƸÀ¢°è¬ÄAzÀ §Ä¯Áªï §A¢vÀÄ. ¥ÀPÀëzÀ gÁµÁÖçzsÀåPÀëgÀ ºÉÆuÉ ºÉÆgÀ®Ä CªÀgÀÄ ¢°èUÉ vÉgÀ½zÀgÀÄ.   CªÀgÀ GvÀægÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæ UÀzÀÄÝUÉ KjzÀgÀÄ. ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ §®UÀå §AlgÉAzÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdPÁgÀtzÀ ®ªÀ PÀıÀgÉAzÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ¥ÀqÉzÀ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥Ánî ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ ºÉUÀqÉ zÀéAiÀÄgÀ°è, ®ªÀ¤UÉ CzÀȵÀÖ ®Qëöä DUÀ M°zÀgÉ, PÀıÀ£ÀÄ vÀ£Àß CªÀPÁ±ÀPÁÌV E£ÀÆß ºÀ¢£ÉÊzÀÄ ªÀµÀð PÁAiÀĨÉÃPÁ¬ÄvÀÄ.

        DUÀ ¥ÁnîjUÉ   £Á®ÄÌ ªÀµÀðzÀ CªÀ¢ü. CzÀ£ÀÄ C¨Á¢üvÀªÁV ¥ÀÆgÉʸÀĪÀzÀPÉÌ AiÀiÁªÀ PÀAlPÀUÀ¼ÀÆ EgÀ°®è. DzÀgÉ ¢ürÃgÀ£É §AzÀ PÁAUÉæ¹£À «¨sÀd£É CªÀgÀ J®è D±ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß  ¨sÀUÀß ªÀiÁrvÀÄ. CA¢£À PÁAUÉæ¸À CzsÀåPÀëgÁzÀ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ §AqÉzÀÝ EA¢gÁUÁA¢ü PÁAUÉæ¸À£ÀÄß ºÉÆüÀÄ ªÀiÁrzÁUÀ, «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉVzÀÝgÀÄ. 1971gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ UÀÄA¥ÀÄ ¥ÀgÁdAiÀÄ UÉÆAqÁU, PÁAUÉæ¸À ±Á¸ÀPÀgÀ°è §ºÀÄvÉÃPÀgÀÄ EA¢gÁ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV ªÁ°zÁUÀ, ¥ÀzÀvÁåUÀ ªÀiÁqÀzÉà ¥ÁnîjUÉ UÀvÀåAvÀgÀ«gÀ°®è.  CªÀgÀ CªÀ¢ü E£ÀÄß ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ªÀµÀð ¥ÀÆwðAiÀiÁVgÀ°®è.

        JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀiÁzÀzÀÄÝ 1989gÀ°è. D ¥ÀzÀªÀ£ÀÄß»rAiÀÄ®Ä CªÀgÀÄ AiÀiÁgÀ ªÀÄfð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ D²ÃªÁðzÀUÀ½UÉ PÁAiÀĨÉÃPÁVgÀ°®. CzÀÄ d£ÀUÀ¼À ¤zsÁðgÀªÁVvÀÄÛ.  CªÀgÀÄ  ¥ÀæzÉñÀ PÁAUÉæ¸ÀzÀ PÀtðzsÁgÀvÀé ªÀ»¹, ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉUÉ ºÉÆÃzÁUÀ, ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ CvÀ ºÉaÑ£À ªÀÄÆgÀÄ-£Á¯ÁÌA±À §ºÀĪÀÄvÀ PÉÆlÄÖ PÁAUÉ渣ÀÄß C¢üPÁgÀzÀvÀæ  PÉÆAqÉÆAiÀÄÝgÀÄ.. DzÀgÉ CA¢£À ¥ÀæzsÁ¤ gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ PÉAUÀtÂÚUÉ UÀÄjAiÀiÁUÀ ºÀ£ÉÆßAzÀÄ wAUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀzÀPÉÌ «zÁAiÀÄ ºÉüÀ¨ÉÃPÁ¬ÄvÀÄ. M§â £Á®ä£ÉAiÀÄ zÀeÉð vÉUÉAiÀįÁgÀzÀµÀÄÖ »Ã£ÁAiÀĪÁV gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ¥ÁnîgÀ£ÀÄß £ÀqɹPÉÆAqÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄgÉAiÀÄĪÀAw®è. . ¥ÁnîjUÉ CzÉà ¥Á±ÀéðªÁAiÀÄÄ DVvÀÄÛ. ªÉÄïÁV ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¸ÀÄvÀÛªÀÄÄvÀÛ®Ä PÁAUÉæ¹£À PÉ® zsÀÄjÃtgÀ PÀÄvÀAvÀæ¢AzÀ ªÀÄwÃAiÀÄ UÀ®¨sÉ £ÀqÉ¢vÀÄÛ. ¥ÁnîgÀ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ CzÀ£ÀÄ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀiÁqÀĪÀzÀgÀ°è ¤gÀvÀªÁzÁUÀ, ¥ÁnîgÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄ£ÉUÉ PÀ½¸ÀĪÀzÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ zÀ ¥ÀæªÁ¸À ªÀÄÄV¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ªÀÄgÀ½°zÀÝ gÁfêÀ UÁA¢ü «ªÀiÁ£À ¤¯ÁÑtzÀ°è EzÀ£ÀÄß ªÀgÀ¢UÁgÀjUÉ w½¹ «ªÀiÁ£ÀzÀ°è ºÁjºÉÆÃzÀgÀÄ. EAvÀºÀ ªÀĺÀvÀézÀ ¸ÀÄ¢ÝAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀåQÛUvÀ w½¸À¨ÉÃPÉ£ÀÄߪÀ ªÀÄÆ® ¨sÀÆvÀ ¸Ëd£ÀåªÀ£ÀÆß gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀÄ vÉÆÃj¸À¢gÀĪÀzÀÄ zÉÆqÀتÀgÀ°ègÀĪÀ ¸ÀtÚvÀ£ÀzÀ ¤zÀ±Àð£À.Û.

        gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄäzÉà DzÀ PÁgÀtPÉÌ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀ£ÀÄ zÀAr¹gÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ. DzÀgÉ CzÀgÀ ±ÉSÉ vÀUÀ°zÀÄÝ PÀ£ÁðlPÀPÉÌ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁAUÉæ¸À ¥ÀPÀëPÉÌ.  «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîjUÀAvÀÆ DzÀ DWÁvÀ C¥ÁgÀ.  CzÀgÀ  ºÉÆqÉvÀ¢AzÀ CªÀjUÉ ¨ÉÃUÀ ZÉÃvÀj¹PÉƼÀî®Ä  CUÀ°®è. §ºÀĪÀÄvÀ«zÀÝgÀÆ, PÁAUÉæ¹UÉ ªÀÄÄA¢£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀĨsÀzÀæ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ PÉÆqÀ®Ä DUÀ°®è. ªÀÄvÉÛgÀqÀÄ ¨Áj PÁAUÉæ¸À ªÀjµÀ× ªÀÄAqÀ½ £ÁAiÀÄPÀvÀé §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ ªÀiÁrzÀgÉ, ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è PÁAUÉæ¸À£ÀÄß ªÀÄ£ÉUÉ PÀ½¹zÀgÀÄ.

        EzÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÆ® PÁgÀtªÉAzÀgÉ GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ PÀtät AiÉÄAzÉà ¥Àæ¹zÀÞgÁVzÀÝ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥Án®jUÁzÀ CªÀªÀiÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄ vÀªÀÄUÁzÀ CªÀªÀiÁ£ÀªÉAzÉà GvÀægÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¹, , PÁAUÉæ¹zÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è vÀPÀÌ ²PÉëAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆlÖgÀÄ. CAzÀÄ PÀ¼ÉzÀÄ PÉÆArzÀÝ ªÀÄvÀzÁgÀgÀ £ÀA©PÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÁAUÉæ¸À EA¢UÀÆ ªÀÄgÀ½ UÀ½¸À¯ÁV®è. DqÀ½vÀzÀ°è CªÀgÀÄ ±ÀÄgÀĪÀiÁrzÀ zÀPÀëvÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀªÀð CªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ £ÉÃ¥ÀxÀPÉÌ  ¸Àj¬ÄvÀÄ.

        ¹PÀÌ C¯ÁàªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°èAiÉÄà vÁªÀÅ zÀPÀë CqÀ½vÀUÁgÀgÉAzÀÄ vÉÆÃj¹zÀÄzÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀ ºÉZÀÄÑUÁjPÉ.   .        »AzÀĽzÀ vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀgÀÄ f¯ÉèAiÀiÁzÀ PÀ®§ÄVðAiÀÄ°èAiÉÄà Cw »AzÀĽzÀ vÁ®ÆPÁzÀ aAZÉÆýAiÉÄà EªÀgÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ PÉëÃvÀæ. E°è¬ÄAzÀ CªÀgÀÄ JAzÀÆ ¸ÉÆî°®è. F PÉëÃvÀæªÀ£À£ÀÄ ©lÄÖ EvÀgÉqÉUÉ CªÀgÀÄ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ ¤AwzÀÄÝ MAzÀÄ ¨Áj ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ ZÀÄ£ÁÀªÀuÉUÉ ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃl¢AzÀ ¸Àà¢üð¹zÁUÀ ªÀiÁvÀæ.

        ¸ÁzÁUÀ¥ÀÄà §tÚzÀ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ «ÄvÀ¨sÁ¶. G½zÀªÀgÀAvÉ ºÀgÀmÉ ¦æAiÀÄgÀ®è. gÁdå ¤ªÀiÁðtªÁzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ CªÀgÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÉëÃvÀæªÁzÁUÀ CªjUÉ  ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ ªÉÆzÀ® ªÀÄAwæ ªÀÄAqÀ¼ÀzÀ°è zÉÆgÀQzÀÄÝ G¥ÀªÀÄAwæ ¸ÁÜ£À ªÀiÁvÀæ..  CªÀgÀ ¥ÀjZÀAiÀÄ §ºÀ¼À ªÀÄA¢UÉ EgÀ°®è. .  ºÉÊzÉgÁ¨ÁzÀzÀ G¸Áä¤AiÀiÁ «±Àé«zÁå®AiÀÄzÀ°è GzÀÄðzÀ°è N¢ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ¥ÀzÀ« ¥ÀqÉzÀ CªÀgÀÄ PÀ£ÀßqÀ EAVèõÀUÀ½VAvÀ ¸À°Ã¸ÁV GzÀÄð zÀ°è ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁqÀĪÀAvÀºÀgÀÄ. CªÀgÀ GzÀÄð «Ä²ævÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀ MªÉÆäªÉÄä PÉüÀÄUÀjUÉ  CxÀðªÁUÀÄwÛgÀ°®è. MAzÀÄ vÀgÀºÀzÀ M¼ÀªÀÄÄT ¸Àé¨sÁªÀ CªÀgÀzÀÄ.

        CªÀgÀ ¸ÁªÀÄxÀåðzÀ CjªÀÅ ªÀÄÆqÀ®Ä ±ÀÄgÀĪÁzÀÄzÀÄ, ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀÄ ¥ÀæzÉñÀ PÁAUÉæ¸À CzsÀåPÀëgÁzÀ PÁ®zÀ°è, EªÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EªÀgÀ ¸ÀºÉÆÃzÉÆåÃV ²æà gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ  ºÉUÀqÉAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ¥ÀæzÉñÀ PÁAUÉæ¹£À ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð UÀ¼ÉAzÀÄ £ÉêÀÄPÀUÉÆAqÁUÀ. CA¢£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀPÀëzÀ ¸ÀAWÀl£ÉUÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ  ©. r  dwÛAiÀĪÀgÀ £ÉÃvÀÈvÀézÀ°è£À ¥ÀPÀëzÀ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ ¨ÁAzsÀªÀåªÀÅ ªÀÄzsÀÄgÀªÁVgÀ°®è. ¥ÀPÀëªÀÅ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ PÀqÉUÉ EzÀÝgÉ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ dwAiÀĪÀgÀ UÀÄA¦£À PÉÊAiÀÄ°è EvÀÄÛ. JgÀqÀÄ UÀÄA¥ÀÄUÀ¼À £ÀqÀÄªÉ zÀĸÀÄzÀĸÀÄ £ÀqÉÀzÉà EvÀÄÛ. ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁVzÀÝ  ºÀgÀ¥À£ÀºÀ½î, £ÀgÀUÀÄAzÀ ªÉÆzÀ¯ÁzÀ «zsÁ£À ¸À¨sÁ ªÀÄvÀPÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼ÀªÀ£ÀÄß gÁdQÃAiÀÄ PÁgÀtPÁÌV «ÄøÀ®Ä PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß  dwÛ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀ ªÀiÁrzÀgÉ, Erà ¥ÀæzÉñÀ PÁAUÉæ¸À£ÀÄß ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV  ¥ÀjªÀwð¹zÀªÀgÀ°è ¥Ánî ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉUÀqÉAiÀĪÀgÀ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄRgÀÄ.

  .      ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà £ÀªÀgÀ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ°è ¥Ánî ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉUÀqÉ zÀéAiÀÄgÀÄ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀ»¹PÉÆArzÀÝgÀÄ. ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÉÆÃ¥ÀAiÉÆÃV SÁvÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁVzÀÝgÀÄ. EA¢£ÀAvÉ F SÁvÉ CAzÀÄ ºÀjzÀÄ ºÀAa ºÉÆÃVgÀ°®è.  ¥ÀæªÀÄÄRªÁzÀ ¤ÃgÁªÀj SÁvÉAiÀÄÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÉÆ¥ÀAiÉÆÃV SÁvÉAiÀÄ CAUÀªÁVvÀÄÛ. CA¢£À J®è ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR UÀÄwÛUÉ zÁgÀgÉ®è ¯ÉÆÃPÉÆ¥ÀAiÉÆÃV E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ D¢üãÀzÀ°è §gÀÄwæzÀÝgÀÄ.  ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ GvÁægÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁUÀĪÀ  §UÉUÉ ¥ÉÊ¥ÉÆÃn ±ÀÄgÀĪÁzÁUÀ, ¥ÁnîgÀ PÉÊÉ §®¥r¸ÀĪÀ°è  UÀÄwÛUÉzÁgÀ §¼ÀUÀªÀÇ ¥ÁvÀæ ªÀ»¹vÀÄÛ J£ÀÄߪÀ  ªÀiÁvÀÄ CA¢£À gÁdPÁgÀtzÀ°è §ºÀ¼À d£Àd¤vªÁVvÀÄÛ.

        1956 gÀ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ 1968gÀ°è §zÀ°AiÀiÁVzÀÝgÀÄ. PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è£À ºÀ£ÉßgÀqÀÄ ªÀµÀðzÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ C£ÀĨsÀªÀ MqÀ£Ál CªÀgÀ ªÀåQÛvÀézÀ°è, £ÀqÉ£ÀÄrAiÀÄ°è §ºÀ¼À §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ vÀA¢gÀĪÀzÀÄ d£ÀgÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §gÀzÉà EgÀ°®è. . ºÉÊzÀgÁ¨ÁzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀzÀ MgÀlÄ ¨ÁóµÉAiÀÄ ¸ÉÆUÀqÀÄ ªÀiÁAiÀĪÁV, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ EvÀgÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼ d£ÀgÉÆqÀ£É ¸À°Ã¸ÁV ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁqÀĪÀµÀÄÖ CªÀgÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀzÀ°è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀiÁw£À°è ¥ÀjªÀvÀð£ÉAiÀiÁVvÀÄÛ., GvÀÛªÀÄ ¨sÁµÀtPÁgÀgÁUÀ¢zÀÝgÀÆ, ºÉüÀĪÀzÀ£ÀÄß aPÀÌzÁV ZÉÆPÀÌzÁV, ªÁ¸ÀÛ«PÀ  £É¯UÀnÖ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉüÀĪÀ P¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀÄ gÀÆrü¹UÉÆArzÀÝgÀÄ. CªÀjUÉ ¥ÀjtwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¨É¼É¹PÉÆArzÀÝgÀÄ.   ¥ÀwæPÁ UÉÆöÖUÀ¼À°è ºÉüÀĪÀzÉ®èªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀàÀµÀÖªÁV AiÀiÁªÀ ¸ÀAzÉúÀPÀÆÌ CªÀPÁ±À PÉÆqÀzÀAvÉ ºÉüÀĪÀ ¸Àé¨sÁªÀ CªÀgÀzÀÄ.  AiÀiÁªÀ ªÀiÁw£À°èAiÀiÁUÀ°Ã, DqÀ½vÁvÀäPÀ, zsÉÆÃgÀuÁvÀäPÀ CxÀªÁ gÁdQÃAiÀĪÁVgÀ°,  AiÀiÁªÀÅzÀgÀ°èAiÀÄÆ  CªÀgÀÄ C£ÁªÀ±ÀåPÀªÁV ¹QÌ ºÁQPÉƼÀÄîwÛgÀ°®è.    

        PÁAUÉæ¹£À «¨sÀd£É¬ÄAzÁV, ªÉÆzÀ® ¨Áj vÀªÀÄä ¥ÀPÀëzÀÝÀ®èzÀ PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÉÆqÀ£É gÁdå ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀªÀÅ ªÀåªÀºÁgÀªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¥Àj¹Üw  «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîjUÉ §AzÉÆzÀVvÀÄ. P£ÁðlPÀ  ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀªÀÅ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ £ÉÃvÀÈvÀézÀ ¸ÀA¸ÁÜ PÁAUÉæ¹£À ¥ÀgÀ G½zÀgÉ PÉÃAzÀæzÀ°è  §AqÉzÀÝ EA¢gÁUÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ CqÀ½vÀ«vÀÄÛ. PÀwÛAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÁªÀÄĪÀiÁqÀĪÀAvÀºÀ ¸ÀÆPÀëöä ¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀÄ°èAiÀÄÆ, AiÀiÁªÀ C£ÁªÀ±ÀåPÀ nÃPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀiÁqÀzÉÃ, «ªÉÃZÀ£É PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉƼÀèzÉà ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁqÀĪÀzÀgÀ°è, ªÀ媺Àj¸ÀĪÀ°è CªÀgÀÄ ¥ÀjtÂvÀgÀÄ. Ä. 1971gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è EA¢gÁ PÁAUÉæ¸À gÁdåzÀ°èAiÀÄÆ dAiÀĨsÉÃj ¨Áj¹zÀÄzÀgÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV, PÁAUÉæ¸À ±Á¸ÀPÀgÀ M®ªÀÅ EA¢gÁ PÁAUÉæ¸À ¥ÀgÀªÁV vÉÆÃjzÁUÀ, «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ PɼÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀzÀÄÝ EwºÁ¸À.

        ¥ÁnîgÀ  PÀvÀðªÀå zÀPÀëvÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C£ÁªÀ±ÀåPÀ gÁdQÃAiÀÄ nÃPÉUÀ¼À°è vÉÆqÀUÀ¢gÀĪÀzÀÄ  EA¢gÁ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §gÀzÉà ºÉÆÃUÀ°®è.  ºÀ®ªÀÅ ¨Áj ¥ÀgÉÆÃPÀëªÁV «ÃgÉAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀ£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄä ºÉƸÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ PÀqÉUÉ J¼ÉAiÀÄĪÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀß ªÀiÁrzgÀÆ, vÀªÀÄä ¤µÉ×  §zÀ®ÄªÀiÁqÀ®Ä M¥ÀàzÉÃ, «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ¤d°AUÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ G½zÀgÀÄ. £ÀAvÀgÀ aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ G¥ÀZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è EA¢gÁ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÝ ¸Àà¢üð¹ ¸ÉÆÃvÀgÀÄ.

        DzÀgÉ PÉ®ªÀÅ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÀ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è MqÀPÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ §AzÀzÀÆÝ  GAlÄ. GzÁºÀgÀtUÁV vÀÄvÀÄð¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀÄ°è vÀªÀÄä d£ÀvÁ ¥ÀjªÁgÀzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ zsÀÄjÃtgÉ®ègÀÆ ¸ÉgɪÀÄ£ÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀgÀÆ, ¥ÁnîgÀÄ JAzÀÆ §AzsÀ£ÀPÉÌ M¼ÀUÁUÀ°®è.  KPÉ J£ÀÄߪÀzÀgÀ §UÉÎ HºÁ¥ÉÆúÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀgÀrzÀªÉà ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ ¤dªÁzÀ PÁgÀt ºÉÆgÀUÉ §g¯Éà E®è.

        ªÉÆzÀ®Ä EA¢gÁ PÁAUÉæ¸À ¸ÉÃgÀ®Ä ¤gÁPÀj¹zÀ «ÃgÉÃAzÀæ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À ¢£ÀUÀ¼À°è CzÉà ¥ÀPÀë ¸ÉÃjzÀÄzÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ §ºÀ¼À d£ÀUÀ½UÉ »r¸À°®è. CªÀgÀ »A¨Á®PÀgÀAvÀÆ ¥ÁnîgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä£ÀÄß £ÀqÀĤÃj£À°è PÉÊ©lÖgÀÄ JAzÀÄ §ºÀ¼ÀªÁV ªÀÄgÀÄVzÀgÀÄ.. ¤µÉ× §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ CªÀjUÉ PÀ¼ÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß wgÀÄV vÀAzÀÄPÉÆnÖvÀÄ. ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉUÉ Dj¹ ºÉÆÃzÀgÀÄ  PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁzÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄæ 1989gÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ PÀtðzsÁgÀvÀéªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀ»¹zÀ PÁAUÉæ¸À ªÀÄvÀÛ C¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ªÀiÁr, ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁzÀgÀÆ., EªÀÅ AiÀiÁªÀªÀÅ CªÀgÀÄ ¥PÁëAvÀgÀªÀiÁrzÀ ¥Á¥ÀªÀ£ÀÄß d£ÀgÀ ªÀÄ£À¹ì¤AzÀ vÉÆqÉzÀÄ ºÁP®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀ°®è..  CªÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁfêÀ UÁA¢üAiÀĪÀgÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ ¸Àj¬Ä®è¢zÀÄzÀjAzÀ §AzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÉ®èªÀÇ ¸ÉÆÃj ºÉÆÃzÀÄzÀgÀ ¥ÀjuÁªÀĪÁV CªÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ ¢£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤gÁ±É ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £ÉÆë£ÉÆA¢UÉ PÀ¼ÉAiÀÄÄAvÁ¬ÄvÀÄ.

        CªÀgÀ ¸Àé¨sÁªÀzÀ PÉ®ªÀÅ gÀhÄ®ÄPÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß E°è ºÉüÀ¯Éà ¨ÉÃPÀÄ. CªÀgÉÆqÀ£É §AzÀ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀwæPÉÆÃzÀå«ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉý.   CªÀgÀ £É£À¦£À ±ÀQ CUÁzsÀ. ºÀ®ªÀÅ wAUÀ¼À »AzÉ vÁªÀÅ GvÀÛj¹zÀ ¥Àæ±ÉßUÀ¼À §UÉUÉ ªÀÄvÉÛ PÉýzÀgÉ, »AzÉ ºÉýzÀÄzÀ£Éß, «gÁªÀÄ, C®à«gÁªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆ PÀÆqÀ vÀ¥ÀàzÀAvÉ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀj¸ÀĪÀ ¸Àé¨sÁªÀ CªÀgzÀÄ.

        CªgÀzÉÆAzÀÄ «avÀæ ¥ÀzÀÞw EvÀÄÛ. . ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¸ÀªÀiÁgÀA¨sÀUÀ¼À°è ¨sÁUÀ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÁUÀ CªÀgÀÄ PÀ¥ÀÄà PÀ£ÀßqÀPÀ zsÀj¸ÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. EzÀÄ »ÃUÉÃPÉ JAzÀÄ ¸À®à vÀ¤SÉ ªÀiÁrzÁUÀ  ºÉÆgÀ §AzÀ ¸ÀAUÀw E£ÀÆß  «avÀæ . CªÀjUÉ ºÉÆUÀ½ªÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß PÀAqÀgÉ §ºÀ¼À C®fð. ¸ÀªÀiÁgÀA¨sÀUÀ¼À°è, CUÀĪÀzÀÄ EzÉãÉAiÉÄÃ.CzÀjAzÀ ¥ÁgÁU®Ä CªÀgÀÄ PÀ¥ÀÄà PÀ£ÀßqÀPÀªÀ£ÀÄß zsÀj¹, ¤zÉæ ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ ¥ÀæwÃw. ºÉÆUÀ½PÉ PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄÄVzÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ¨sÁµÀtzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀħAzÀ vÀPÀÌt vÀªÀÄä ªÀiÁvÀÄ DgÀA©ü¸ÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ vÀ£ÀPÀªÀÇ F UÀÄlÄÖ AiÀiÁjUÀÆ UÉÆwægÀ°®è. EAvÀºÀ G¥ÁAiÀÄ w½AiÀÄzÉ £ÀªÀÄä zÉêÉUËqÀgÀÄ J®èjUÉ PÁtĪÀAvÉ vÀÆPÀr¸ÀÄvÁÛ J®ègÀ ¯ÉêÀrUÉ UÁæ¸À ªÁzÀgÀÄ.

        AiÀiÁgÉà DVgÀ° CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉ C£ÁªÀ±ÀåPÀ ºÀgÀmÉ ºÉÆqÉAiÀÄĪÀzÀÄ CªÀjUÉ ¸ÉÃgÀÄwÛgÀ°®è. JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwÛUÀ¼ÁV §AzÁUÀ  MAzÀÄ ªÉÆÃf£À ¸ÀAUÀw CªÀgÀ zsÁgÀªÁqÀ f¯ÉèAiÀÄ ¸ÀAZÁgÀzÀ°è £ÀqɬÄvÀÄ.  CªÀgÀ JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¢ªÀ¸ÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀëªÀÄ ªÀļÉAiÀÄ ¸À®ÄªÁV ¨ÉÃUÀ ªÀÄÄV¬ÄvÀÄ. CªÀgÀÄ gÁuÉèɣÀÆßj¤AzÀ gÁwæ gÉ樀 ºÀvÀÄæªÀªÀjzÀÝgÀÄ. DzÀgÉ ¸ÀAeÉAiÀÄ ºÉÆwÛUÉ J®ÎªÀÇ ªÀÄÄVzÀÄ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ £Á®ÄÌ vÁ¸ÀÄ ªÉüɠ ®©ü¹vÀÄÛ. gÁuɨɣÀÆßgÀÄ ¥ÀæªÁ¹ ªÀÄA¢gÀzÀ°è d£ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀvÀðgÀÄ QQÌjzÀÝgÀÄ.  CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ªÉÃ¼É PÀ¼ÉAiÀÄĪÀzÀÄ CªÀjUÉ ¨ÉÃqÀªÁVvÉÛãÉÆÃ. CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨É£ÀÄß ºÀwÛ§A¢zÀÝ  ¥ÀvÀæPÀvÀðgÀ°è £Á«§âgÉà CAzÀgÉ £Á£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀAAiÀÄÄPÀÛ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ²æ C£ÀAvÀ VtÂUÉÃj EzÉݪÀÅ.

        QQÌjzÀ À d£À dAUÀĽAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉÆÃr, CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉ ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À ¹UÀ°QÌ®èªÉA§ C¼ÀÄQ¤AzÀ¯Éà CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨sÉnÖAiÀiÁUÀ§ºÀÄzÉà  JA§ ¸ÀAzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀ½¹zÁUÀ CzÀPÉÌ CªÀgÀÄ vÀPÀët M¦àzÀgÀÄ. . £Á«zÀÝ PÉÆÃuɬÄAzÀ  EvÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÉ PÀ½¹¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ. £Á«gÀĪÀ°èAiÉÄà CªÀgÀÄ zsÁ«¹zÀgÀÄ. £ÀªÀÄä «gÁªÀĪÁzÀ “ºÀgÀm”  ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ JgqÀÄ vÁ¸ÀÄ ªÉÄïÁVgÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ. . .£À£Àß°èzÀÝ GzÀÝ ¥Àæ±ÉßUÀ¼À ¥nÖ ªÀÄÄV¬ÄvÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆ£ÉUÁt¸À¨ÉÃPÁ¬ÄvÉà ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ CªÀjUÉ ¸ÁPÁ¬ÄvÀÄ JAzÉ®è.      DªÁUÀ gÁwæ ºÀvÀÄÛ UÀAmÉÉAiÀiÁVvÀÄÛ. HlªÀiÁr gÉ樀 »rAiÀÄĪÀµÉÖà CªÀjUÉ ªÉÃ¼É G½¢vÀÄÛ.

        gÁwæ §ºÀ¼ÀªÁzÀÄzÀjAzÀ £À£ÀUÉ ªÀgÀ¢ vÀPÀët PÉÆqÀ®Ä ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ«gÀ°®è.  VtÂUÉÃj M§âgÉà vÀªÀÄä ¥ÉÃ¥ÀjUÉ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrzÀgÀÄ. £Á£ÀĺÀħâ½èUÉ ªÀÄgÀ½ ªÀÄgÀÄ¢ªÀ¸À CzÀ£ÀÄß «ªÀgÀªÁV §gÉzÀÄ PÀ½¹zÉ CzÀgÀ ¥sÀ®ªÁV  ªÀÄgÀÄ¢ªÀ¸À  D¢vÀåªÁgÀz »AzÀÆ ¥ÀwæPÉAiÀÄ°è CzsÀð ¥ÀÄlzÀµÀÄÖ  CªÀgÀ ¸ÀAzÀ±Àð£À ¸ÀÄ¢Ý ¥ÀæPÀlªÁVvÀÄæ. ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀwæPÉAiÀĪÀÅ E®èzÀÝjAzÀ EµÀÄÖ «±ÀzÀ ªÀgÀ¢ PÉÆqÀĪÀ ¸Ë¨sÁUÀå £ÀªÀÄä ¥ÀwæPÉAiÀÄzÁVvÀÄÛ.  AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀƪÀð vÀAiÀiÁj ¬Ä®èzÉ. CPÀ¹äPÀªÁV, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆj£À ºÉÆgÀUÉ C©ªÀÈ¢üÝAiÀÄ «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤gÀUÀð¼À ªÀiÁvÀ£ÁrzÀÄÝ  ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CµÀÄÖ ¢ÃWÀð ªÀgÀ¢AiÉÆAzÀÄ CzÀÆ EAVèõÀ ¥ÉÃ¥Àj£À°è §AzzÀÄÝ EA¢UÀÆ zÁR¯ÉAiÀiÁVzÉ.

                E£ÉÆßAzÀÄ CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉV£À ªÀÄgÀAiÀįÁgÀzÀ C£ÀĨsÀªÀªÉAzÀgÉ. CªÀgÀÄ JgÀqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨Áj ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ¼ÁzÀ ¥Àæw ªÁgÀ CªÀgÀ vÀªÀgÀÄ f¯ÉèUÉ §gÀĪÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÀëªÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ºÁQPÉƼÀÄîwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. CzÀPÁÌV ¥ÀæwêÁgÀªÀÅ £Á£ÀÄ PÀ®§ÄVðUÉ ºÉÆÃUÀÄwÛzÉÝ. ªÉüÉAiÀÄ ¥Àj¥Á®£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀjAzÀ PÀ°AiÀĨÉÃPÀÄ. JAlÄ UÀAmÉAiÀÄ ºÉÆwÛUÉ vÀªÀÄä ¥ÁvÀ«ð¢üUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄV¹ £ÁåjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄV¹ vÀAiÀiÁgÁV  PÀĽwgÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ.  D ºÉÆwÛUÉ £Á£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £À£Àß ¸ÀºÉÆzÉÆåÃV ²ªÁ£ÀAzÀgÀÄ  CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨sÉÉnÖAiÀiÁUÀĪÀzÀÄ ªÁrPÉ. ªÉÆzÀ¯Éà ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ ¤UÀ¢ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÉA§ PÀlÖ¯ÉAiÀÄÆ EgÀÄwÛgÀ°®è.  D ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¨sÉnÖAiÀiÁUÀĪÀ d£ÀgÀÆ PÀrªÉÄ. C  £ÁªÀÅ ºÉÆÃUÀĪÀ D ºÉÆwÛUÉ  CA¢£À  ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß N¢ vÀAiÀiÁgÁVgÀÄwzÀÝgÀÄ.  CªÀgÀÄ £ÀªÀÄä ¥Àæ±ÉßUÀ½UÉ vÀqÀªj¸ÀÀzÉà GvÀÛgÀ PÉÆqÀÄØwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. £À®ªÀvÀÄÛ £À®ªÀvÉÛöÊzÀÄ ¤«ÄµÀ £ÀªÉÆäqÀ£É ªÀiÁvÀ£Ár £ÀAvÀgÀ vÀªÀÄä G½zÀ PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ vÉÆqÀUÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ F ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸Á¢ü¸À¯ÁUÀzÀ £À£Àß ß  EvÀgÀ £À£Àß ªÀÈwÛ ¨ÁAzsÀªÀgÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ §AzÀÄ £ÀªÀÄUÉ ºÉýzÀÄzÀ£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄUÀÆ ºÉüÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ UÀAlÄ ©zÁÝUÀ,  ¥ÁnîgÀÄ “K£ÉÆÃ¥Àà CªÀgÉãÉÆà PÉýzÀgÀÄ. £Á£ÀÄ ºÉýzÉ. ¤ÃªÀÅ PÉý ¤ªÀÄUÀÆ ºÉüÀÄvÉÛãɔ JAzÀÄ vÀ¦à¹ PÉƼÀÄîwÛzÀÝgÀÄ. £ÀªÀÄUÉ ºÉýzÀ AiÀiÁªÀ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß vÁªÁVAiÉÄà CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁܦzÉÃ, £ÁªÀÅ PÉýzÀ ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀªÀÄä ¥ÉÃ¥ÀjUÉ «ÄøÀ®Ä EqÀĪºÁUÉAiÀÄÆ CªÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ.

        CªÀgÀAvÀºÀ C£ÀĨsÀ« ªÀÄvÀÄæ zÀPÀëgÀ ªÀiÁUÀzÀ±Àð£À PÀ£ÁðlPÀPÉÌ ºÉZÀÄÑPÁ® ¹QÌzÀÝgÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ¨sÀ«vÀªÀå JµÀÄÖ Gd鮪ÁUÀ §ºÀÄ¢vÀÄÛ J£ÀÄßߪÀzÀÄ  æ“gÉÃ¥s” ¸ÁªÀiÁædåPÉÌ ¸ÉÃjzÀ «µÀAiÀÄ. MAzÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ ¤d. CzÀjAzÀ £ÀµÀÖªÁVgÀĪÀzÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀPÉÌ  ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ ¥ÁnîgÀ®è.  CAvÀºÀgÀÄ  FUÀ ºÀUÀ°£À°è ¢Ã¥À ºÀaÑ ºÀÄqÀÄQzÀgÀÆ ¹UÀĪÀ¢®è.

 (ªÀÄÄV¬ÄvÀÄ) 29.11.11